News >> Browse Articles >> Scandals
Did Medical Bills Lead to Peoria Nurse's Firing?
Judith Graham / Chicago Tribune
January 05, 2009
Tony Dewitt was not going to win his battle with prostate cancer. He knew it. His wife, Phillis, knew it. The people at the hospital where she worked knew it.
But still, Phillis was taken aback when her supervisor asked whether Tony planned to seek hospice care.
“He’s not ready to give up,” Dewitt said she responded.
When her boss raised the subject again a few months later, Dewitt realized executives were monitoring Tony’s soaring medical bills. “He still wants to fight,” she explained, feeling defensive.
Months later, Proctor Hospital suddenly fired Dewitt over an allegation of insubordination. Dewitt, whose employment record was spotless, has another explanation: “They got rid of me because of his medical expenses.”
Now the former nurse manager is locked in a high-profile legal battle with the Peoria hospital, which vigorously disputes her charge. A trial is set for this year after the 7th Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago reversed a lower court’s decision to dismiss the case.
Tony Dewitt died in August 2006, feeling betrayed by an institution he depended on for scans and emergency medical services.
Experts say more conflicts of this kind are likely as economically stressed employers confront escalating health-care costs and the reality that a small number of sick employees or family members account for the vast majority of medical expenses.
“With the economic crisis and the health-care crisis, individuals with employer-provided health care are extremely vulnerable,” said Paul Secunda, an employment law specialist and associate professor at Marquette University Law School in Milwaukee.
As hundreds of thousands of Americans have discovered recently, employers are free to fire workers or terminate benefits to cut costs. But discriminatory action against employees who have disabling medical conditions is not permitted, said Steven Greenberger, an associate dean at DePaul University College of Law.
Lawsuits charging such discrimination will probably become more common in the next year, experts predict, because of changes to the Americans with Disability Act that took effect Jan. 1. The law bars discrimination against the disabled and, in some circumstances, against their associates.
Roy Davis, attorney for Proctor Hospital, said Dewitt’s charges are meritless. The medical center has never dismissed someone because of medical expenses, he said, and it retains several employees with costly health conditions.
raymoss1
10 months ago
164 comments
Really nice. A hospital that does not take care of one of their own. There needs to be more laws protecting the employee not the employer.
Account Removed
10 months ago
ok, and since when is it considered insubordination when someone is not ready to give up? This is the basis of the firing... insubordination??
Account Removed
10 months ago
Since when does a manager call and ask someone to come in for a meeting while they are on vacation? It was hospital approved.