News >> Browse Articles >> General Health

+1

North Carolina to Penalize Obese Workers, Smokers

North Carolina to Penalize Obese Workers, Smokers

The Charlotte Observer

October 12, 2009

RALEIGH, N.C. — North Carolina is poised to become only the second state to impose a fat fee on its state employees by placing them in a more expensive health insurance plan if they’re obese.

Smokers will feel the drag of higher costs, too, as North Carolina state employees who use tobacco are slated to pay more for health insurance next year.

North Carolina officials, coping with a steady uptick in health care costs for state employees each year, are aiming to improve state workers’ health, which saves money in future medical expenses.

“Tobacco use and poor nutrition and inactivity are the leading causes of preventable deaths in our state,” said Anne Rogers, director of integrated health management with the N.C. State Employees Health Plan. “We need a healthy work force in this state. We’re trying to encourage individuals to adopt healthy lifestyles.”

State workers who don’t cut out the Marlboros and Big Macs will end up paying more for health insurance. Tobacco users get placed in a more expensive insurance plan starting next July and, for those who qualify as obese, in July 2011.

Some state employees, though, are criticizing the planned changes. The State Employees Association of North Carolina opposes the tobacco and obesity differentials as invasive steps that could have been avoided if the legislature had fixed the plan.

“It’s my understanding they’re talking about testing (for tobacco use) in the workplace which, to me, would create a hostile environment,” said Kim Martin, a sergeant at Piedmont Correctional Institution in Salisbury. “And it’s an invasion of privacy. This is America, the land of the free. I don’t think (body mass index is) a very good measure. I know some folks who would have a high body mass index because they’re muscular.”

The health plan covers more than 600,000 state employees, retirees and teachers at a total cost last year of $2.6 billion. Last spring, the legislature bailed out the plan with an infusion of $250 million to pay the bills after rising costs and inaccurate projections left little money for claims. Over the next two years, the state general fund will pump about $408 million into the health plan.

While officials have not yet estimated any potential savings from the obesity requirement, the higher costs for smokers could save $13 million in the 2010-2011 budget year, Rogers said, emphasizing that the plan’s priority is to improve health and save money in the process.

The idea of penalizing unhealthy lifestyles and rewarding healthy conduct is hardly new among insurance plans. Public health insurance plans in other states already penalize smokers or reward nonsmokers in insurance costs. South Carolina’s state employees health plan is scheduled to add a $25-per-month surcharge on smokers in January. Elsewhere in the southeast, Kentucky and Georgia impose surcharges, and Alabama gives non-smokers a discount.

Alabama was out front on weight testing. Starting in January, state workers will have their blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose and body mass index checked by a nurse. If they’re in a risk category, such as a body mass index of 35 or greater or a blood pressure of 160/100 or greater, they are charged an extra $25 per month on their insurance premium. If they go to a health screening, either offered by the state or by their personal physician, then the $25 is subtracted, according to Gary Matthews, chief operating officer for the Alabama State Employees Insurance Board.


+1
  • Jagc_staff_corps_insignia_army_max50

    CaptainEricRN

    28 days ago

    4326 comments

    I love the IQ idea!

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    raymoss1

    28 days ago

    164 comments

    This is an unfair policy that is targeting a certain group. What is next? This is a clear case of discrination.

  • F1_028_max50

    alphamale

    about 1 month ago

    28 comments

    Higher levels of education and income also contribute to longevity and lowered morbidity... I say make them pay inversely to their IQ.

  • Deployed_dec_02_-_mar_03_083_max50

    USAFlightMedic

    about 1 month ago

    78 comments

    This is a measure that I would have liked to see implemented a long time ago. Bravo to North Carolina.

  • Dsc00261_max50

    Sykepleier

    about 1 month ago

    68 comments

    PS. If you want to stop smoking. Hit at the heart. Make it illegal. Don't punish someone for doing something that IS legal.

  • Dsc00261_max50

    Sykepleier

    about 1 month ago

    68 comments

    What about people who choose to do stunts as a living? Or people who participate in sports that are dangerous? Or people who drinks too much? This is a ridiculous policy, people don't choose to be sick. Yes they may participate in things that have known risks but I'd dare anyone to say that never in their life have they done anything that have dangers. And how do you determine what kind of a smoker qualifies? If they say they don't and you can smell it do you have the right to put them as a smoker anyway? What if they live with a smoker and inhale sencond hand smoke? That's still a choice. This is dumb. And Obesity?? Lord don't even get me started. They're are many who try as they might can't lose weight and they're people who can't exercise for other reasons and so become obese. This is no way to give health care. Everyone has a right to equal healthcare regardless of anything.

  • Sarah_m_max50

    Smm306

    about 1 month ago

    6 comments

    Discriminate against smokers!? Saying it's your choice one way or the other to smoke fits in the same category with people who choose to eat poorly and become obese. Ultimately both choices result in increased health care costs, which correlates with higher insurance premiums and costs. Partaking in maladaptive behaviors and health practices coupled with lack of exercise and physical activity puts people at risk for certain chronic diseases such as Obesity, diabetes and heart disease. People with these chronic diseases often have compromised immune systems putting them at higher risk for other health conditions, which becomes very taxing on the health care system. People who take care of themselves by staying physically active with good nutrition and health care practices shouldn't pay for others lack of concern for their health. People who mainly use their health benefits for routine check ups should not pay an increase for health care coverage due to their co-workers sedentary life style and poor nutrition, that is madness.

  • Stve_and_meg_and_joe_labor_day_week_end_2009_max50

    daphnie3677

    about 1 month ago

    14 comments

    Now for smoking, it is not good to discriminate against smokers. Tome, it is my choice on way or the other. I think it's alot like racism. People are just looking for something to complain about. This whole concept of smoking is really over blown. If it's not smoking, then it's obesity...soon it will be something else.Just stop the madness!!!!

  • Stve_and_meg_and_joe_labor_day_week_end_2009_max50

    daphnie3677

    about 1 month ago

    14 comments

    People need to learn that the BMI scale does not apply anymore. It wasn't even suppose to be used to classify people. They need to go to Doctor Oz's site and learn the real meaning of that bogus number. Also there was a case of a child being denied for insurance d/t his BMI number. The child was considered obese on the bous scale. It has since been over turned. HMMMM... wonder why? Come on people lets get on the band wagon and realize that some numbers just do not make sense!!!!!!


Recent Activity

Img_6921_max30
leng commented on: "John R", 1 minute ago.
John_max30
Nurse_John commented on: "Angela York", 4 minutes ago.
John_max30
Nurse_John received the quiz result of "Not Ideal", 10 minutes ago.
John_max30
Nurse_John posted in: "THINK FAST - keep it going!", 16 minutes ago.
8228_163701129352_589054352_2686045_5404849_n_max30
princsheather commented on: "John R", 17 minutes ago.