Everything Nurses >> Rx Corner >> Med. Errors

Rate

Med. Errors

132 Views
8 Replies Flag as inappropriate
Me_in_cocceticut_max50

25446 posts

back to top

Posted 5 months ago

 

Would you report an error?


 

We as nurses have been told time and time again there should be no fear of reporting medical errors. We are told in our hospital orientations as well as during all of our years of nursing education that there is no retaliation to reporting a medical error. Reporting an error increases patient safety, we all know that. I believe we all agree with that premise, but do you really think your professional career is not at risk if you are the one submitting the report. Is there really no report retaliation?

 

I’m asking a hypothetical question here. I’m not disputing, arguing, defending or defaming any particular facility or individual. I’m simply curious as to what is the nursing community’s consensus on reporting medical errors? Are you really free of fear?

 

I’m referring to any type of error. Is there really such thing as a ‘small’ error when it refers to patient safety? Who are we to decide when an error or mistake is allowable.

 

It’s quite the clash isn’t it? Here you are as a professional doing your best to ‘do no harm’. It’s our job to advocate for the patient, for all patients. We are given the responsibility to ‘speak’ for the patient, especially when the patient cannot speak for themselves. It’s the ultimate burden for those that don’t practice this skill.

 

On the other side of the coin is self-preservation. We love our job (most of us). We love practicing as a nurse. We love making the difference. We of course *AHEM*.. love to be employed too. We do enjoy paying our bills and having a steady income, especially in this tough economy!

 

So what if you had to choose? Patient advocacy or your job? Now, remember this is purely hypothetical. Because we have all been taught, trained and tirelessly educated on the ‘no report retaliation’ concept. It’s our job to report the errors- and we won’t lose out jobs for reporting.

 

I may be embellishing a little here, I admit it. But what if?

 

While we’re being honest here, lets not forget that there are other health care professionals out there that have lost their jobs for doing this very thing (see the link articles referenced below).

 

This fear of retaliation is very real. And whether we or any other health care professional will openly or publicly admit to it, this fear motivates our decision making skills, hypothetical or not.

Me_in_cocceticut_max50

25446 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 5 months ago

 



Nurse Perceptions of Medication Errors: What We Need to Know for Patient Safety


 

Abstract


This study describes nurse perceptions about medication errors. Findings reveal that there are differences in the perceptions of nurses about the causes and reporting of medication errors. Causes include illegible physician handwriting and distracted, tired, and exhausted nurses. Only 45.6% of the 983 nurses believed that all drug errors are reported, and reasons for not reporting include fear of manager and peer reactions. The study findings can be used in programs designed to promote medication error recognition and reduce or eliminate barriers to reporting.


 


MEDICATION errors strike at the heart of being a nurse-the responsibility to do good and avoid harm. Medication errors have serious direct and indirect results, and are usually the consequence of breakdowns in a system of care. Direct results include patient harm as well as increased healthcare costs. Indirect results include harm to nurses in terms of professional and personal status, confidence, and practice.


Everyone concerned about patient safety equates medication errors with serious risks to patients. Medication errors also impact organizations and nurses. Ten to 18% of all reported hospital injuries have been attributed to medication errors.


 Five percent of all medication errors reported to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2001 were fatal. 3 United States data from 1993 indicate that 7391 patients died from medication errors, and patient stays associated with medication errors increased by 4.6 days, with a resulting cost increase of $4685 per patient. 1 In the state of California alone, over 700 patients die each year because of medication errors




MEDICATION ERRORS


Medication errors are typically defined as deviations from a physician's order. Hospital medication error rates can be as high as 1.9 per patient per day.


 Sources of errors include illegibly written orders, dispensing errors, calculation errors, monitoring errors, and administration errors (ie, giving the wrong medication to the patient). Physicians, pharmacists, unit clerks, and nurses can be involved in the occurrence of medication errors. A single patient can receive up to 18 doses of medication per day, 6 and a nurse can administer as many as 50 medications per shift.   This places the nurse at the front line when it comes to drug administration accountability


Medication errors negatively affect nurses. The psychological trauma caused by committing a medication error can be overwhelming to a nurse. First, nurses worry about the patient. Nurses may feel upset, guilty, and terrified about making a medication error. In addition, they can experience a loss of confidence in their clinical practice abilities. Finally, they can feel anger at themselves as well as the system.

 

No studies have demonstrated strong relationships between nurse characteristics (ie, age, years of practice, and education) and number of medication errors.


  This would seem to indicate that any nurse is potentially at risk for making a medication error.




 

Me_in_cocceticut_max50

25446 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 5 months ago

 

REPORTING MEDICATION ERRORS


Whether the nurse is the source of an error, a contributor, or an observer, organizations rely on nurses as front-line staff to recognize and report medication errors. Several studies have demonstrated underreporting among nurses.


Adding to the burden of reporting, more than 90% of the self-reports are paper-based in California.


Prevention of medication errors is linked to accurate reporting of medication errors. Reporting medication errors is dependent on individual nurse's decision making.


Underreporting or not reporting medication errors conceals flawed systems


Currently, self-reported medication errors provide minimal information to organizations because discrepancies, in terms of reported-to-actual rates, are widespread. Medication errors are typically reported through institutional reporting systems such as incident reports.


Moore, however, estimated that organizations relying on incident reports to provide data miss up to 95% of the medication errors. Reports are generated by the nurse who identifies the error and then are forwarded to management, quality departments, or risk management departments. Reporting systems are dependent on the nurse's ability to recognize an error has occurred, belief that the error warrants reporting, belief that she/he has committed the error, and willingness to overcome the embarrassment and fear of retaliation for having committed a medication administration error.


Nurses themselves believe only 25% of all medication errors are reported using incident reports. Only 3.5% of the nurses in the study of Osborne et al believed that all medication errors are ever reported.


Nurse managers and physicians also believe that medication errors are underreported by nurses. Errors of both commission and omission go unreported. Failure to administer a medication is the most underreported error because nurses perceive that patients will not be harmed in this situation. Conversely, errors resulting in overmedication are the most frequently reported


Nurses deliberately decide to not report some medication errors.


It is estimated that 95% of medication errors are not reported because staff fear punishment. Disciplinary actions including job loss also affect reporting rates. Staff nurses also fear being revealed and labeled as someone who has made a medication error. Nurses and nurse managers report that they fear for the reputation of their service or unit.


Other reasons for not reporting medication errors include disagreement over the definition of an error and the need to report it as well as the degree of reporting effort, ie, time to complete reports.


Interestingly, Osborne et al found that 15.8% of the nurses in their study were unsure as to what situation constituted a medication error, and 14% were not sure when to report the error.


Most of these studies have limitations that include an inadequate number of sites (eg, one hospital) and units (eg, one medical and surgical unit). It is difficult to know to what degree the local culture influences nurse perceptions about medication errors in these limited site studies. Nonrandom sampling and small sample sizes raise additional methodological issues.


No matter what reporting mechanisms, policies, or procedures are in place, reporting medication errors remains dependent on the nurse's ability to detect medication errors and individual nurse's decision making to report medication errors. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) states that root cause analysis, while analyzing underlying systems, must include an assessment of the human and other factors.


For various reasons, possibly including nurse inability to detect medication errors, perceptions that certain medication errors will not harm patients, or fear of consequences associated with reporting, nurses do not report all detected medication errors. This study was undertaken to understand more about nurse perceptions of medication errors and reporting.


 

Me_in_cocceticut_max50

25446 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 5 months ago

 



METHOD


This study examined the perceptions of medication errors among a large number of randomly selected nurses in multiple settings. More specifically, it was designed to investigate what nurses believe constitutes a medication error, what is reportable, and what barriers to reporting exist. A self-report survey method was used to collect data for this descriptive, correlational study. The current study replicated a study conducted by Osborne et al by using a larger sample of nurses working in more diverse settings.

 


Population and sample


United Nurses Association of California/Union of Health Care Professionals (UNAC/UHCP) union-represented registered nurses (RNs) practicing in 16 Southern California acute care hospitals represented the study target population of 9000 acute care nurses. Work settings consisted of private, government, military, and health maintenance organization hospitals.


A random sample of 5000 RNs was selected from the above population.


a final sample size of 1000 RNs would be optimal for this type of study. In 2 previous studies that used this study's instrument, response rates ranged from 61.9% 12 to 79%. 10 Historic response rates for surveys mailed to UNAC RNs ranged from 25% to 40%. So, taking a conservative approach, 5000 UNAC RNs were mailed surveys in an attempt to obtain a final sample size of approximately 1000 participants.


Instrument


The Modified Gladstone


was chosen to collect data for this study. This instrument measured nurse perceived causes of medication errors percentage of drug errors reported to nurse managers types of incidents that would be classified as (a) medication errors, (b) reportable to physicians, or (c) reportable using an incident report ( ); and nurse views about reporting medication errors . For the purpose of this study, one additional item was added to "types of incidents" that reflected a therapeutic drug level medication scenario. The last portion of the instrument captured nurse demographic data . Instrument content validity was determined acceptable by previous investigators. In addition, Osborne et al established reliability using the test-retest method (0.78) in their sample.


RESULTS


Nine hundred eighty-three RNs responded to the survey, representing a 20% return rate. Similar to nurses across the country, the RN mean age was 44.6 years (range = 23-74 years; SD = 9.07). Nurses were primarily female (95%), had been practicing for an average of 18.7 years (range = 1-45 years; SD = 9.94), worked full time (62.7%), and were in benefited positions (88.2%). Similar to the state of California RNs, the ethnic backgrounds of the study participants were varied (49% white, 34% Pacific Islander, 8% Hispanic, 4% African American, and 4% other), as was their highest level of education (11% diploma, 40% associate degree, 44% bachelor's degree, 3% master's degree, and 3% other). Nurses represented all working shifts (42% day, 18% evening, 17% night, 12% 7 AM-7 PM, 8% 7 PM-7 AM, and 4% other). Medical/surgical (M/S), critical care, and maternal child health (MCH) practice settings were represented Overall, the RNs responding to this survey were representative of nurses working in Southern California.


 


 




Nurse practice settings


 


As part of the demographic survey, RNs were also asked the number of medication errors they could remember making over the course of their career. The mean number of errors recalled was 4.9 per nurse (range = 0-100; SD = 5.67). However, most nurses (68.3%) recalled making 2 to 5 errors over their career.


Analysis of the data focused on addressing the study aims that were to describe the following:


1. nurse perceived causes of medication errors,


2. nurse evaluation of medication scenarios,


3. nurse perceptions about reporting medication errors, and


4. relationships between nurse characteristics (demographics) and perceptions regarding medication errors.




 

Me_in_cocceticut_max50

25446 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 5 months ago

 

Causes of medication errors




the ranked causes of medication errors as perceived by the participating RNs. Nurses ranked the listed causes from 1 to 10, with 1 indicating most frequent cause and 10 indicating least frequent cause. Mean scores were calculated for each item and are listed in the table. The top 3 ranked (out of 10) perceived causes of drug errors were the following: (1) MD handwriting is difficult to read or illegible, (2) nurses are distracted, and (3) nurses are tired and exhausted.




 


 


Medication scenario evaluation


how nurses classified each scenario as a medication error (yes or no responses) and if they would or would not report the situation to a physician or complete an incident report. Classifying and reporting medication errors differed between and within scenarios.


 


 


 


Classifying and reporting of medication errors


 


Some scenarios elicited common responses in terms of classifying medication scenarios. For example, most nurses (96.6%) responded that they would classify a fast running TPN (total parental nutrition) rate (200 mL/h for 3 hours instead of the correct 125 mL/h) as a drug error; 92.1% would notify the physician; and 93.3% would complete an incident report. On the other hand, most nurses (91.8%) would not classify as a medication error the withholding of a routine morning dose of digoxin because the digoxin blood level report was late. However, in this case 55.4% would notify the physician, but only 11.2% would complete an incident report.


For other scenarios, nurses had quite disparate responses. For example, nurses were split (55.5% versus 44.5%) in their classification of a scenario involving omission of a medication while the patient was sleeping. However, once again more nurses would notify the physician (62.7% versus 37.3%), yet were split (48.3% versus 51.7%) when it came to completing an incident report.


In 5 out of the 6 scenarios, more nurses would notify physicians than not notify them no matter how they first classified the scenarios. In 5 out of the 6 scenarios, more nurses would not complete an incident report; this decision mirrored their original classification of the scenario as either being a medication error or not being a medication error.


Reporting medication errors


In addition to evaluating scenarios, nurses were also asked, "In your estimation, what percent of all drug errors are reported to the nurse manager by the completion of an incident report?" The mean percentage was 45.6, indicating that less than half of the nurses believed that all drug errors are reported to a nurse manager using an incident report.




presents additional nurse responses to statements about reporting medication errors. Most nurses indicated that they knew what constituted a medication error (92.6%) and when to report an error using an incident report (91.3%). Reasons for not reporting errors included "afraid of manager reaction" (76.9%), "afraid of coworkers' reactions" (61.4%), and "not thinking an error was serious enough" (52.9%). However, the majority of nurses (80.4%) do not seem to fear disciplinary action (losing one's job) because of committing an error.




 


 

Me_in_cocceticut_max50

25446 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 5 months ago

 

Links between nurse responses and nurse characteristics


Very few nurse characteristics were associated with the survey responses including the number of errors nurses remembered making over their career. Overall, nurses working in an MCH versus an M/S setting reported they perceived a greater percentage of medication errors are reported. For example, nurses working in neonatal intensive care units indicated they perceived a greater percentage of medication errors (52.5%) are reported to nurse managers than did nurses working in M/S units (eg, 35.3% oncology).


Even though nurses working in a MCH unit versus M/S unit responded as above, the relationship between type of unit and percentage of perceived reported errors was weak (r = 0.21; P = .01). There also was a weak relationship between percentage of errors perceived reported and years of RN practice (r = 0.15; P < .001). This means that these 2 RN characteristics, type of unit and years of practice, explain very little about how nurses responded to this question. Overall, while there were a few significant relationships found between the nurse characteristics and items on the survey, these relationships were weak.


Limitations


The sample for this study was drawn from a healthcare union, and therefore, the findings may not be generalizable to nonrepresented RNs. Regarding the ranking of medication errors, there may be additional causes that were not identified on this study's survey. However, the top ranked causes from this study could be a starting point for organizations to address system issues. In addition, the scenarios were brief and did not provide situational details. We have no way to know if nurses read more into the scenarios than what was provided; however, lengthening surveys can decrease overall return rates. The decision was made to retain the brief scenarios in order to optimize the sample size.


NURSING IMPLICATIONS


Similar to other studies, no single or combination of nurse demographic characteristics were strongly associated with nurse perceptions of medication errors or the reporting of medication errors. Thus, all nurses in an organization may need help in identifying what is a medication error, when to report it, and to whom. What this means for nurses working on quality and patient safety programs is that, most likely, there are no specific groups of nurses to target for interventions or education. For example, inexperienced nurses are not reporting more or less errors than do experienced nurses. This once again emphasizes systemic problems at issue in regard to medication errors.


This study calls attention to the need to clarify with nursing staff what constitutes a medication error. Interestingly, nurses were "usually sure what constitutes an error" (92.6% yes, 7.4% no) yet were not in high agreement with one another when given actual medication scenarios (ie, 52.7% yes, 55.5% no). This study has identified a gap between the nurse's perceived knowledge and his or her actual knowledge. It is clear that nurses need specific information about what constitutes medication errors. The information gained from this study can be used in educational programs designed to promote the recognition of these errors.


Now that we know nurses differ in their perceptions as to what constitutes a medication error, do organizations have clear guidelines available as to what situations represent medication errors? Regardless of our personal opinions, traditions related to nursing's 5 rights of medication administration, or our unstated expectations, this study demonstrates that nurses are not "on the same page" as to what is a medication error and when to report to it.


Currently, organizations are having their patient safety programs examined in great detail by accrediting and licensing bodies. Paramount to any patient safety program is the medication error-reporting component. The purpose of having a comprehensive, accurate, and timely reporting program in place is to be able to identify and correct knowledge and system defects immediately.


 

Me_in_cocceticut_max50

25446 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 5 months ago

 

Similar to studies by Gladstone


this study identified differences in reporting medication errors as well as perceived barriers to reporting. However, strong barriers to reporting did not include fear of disciplinary action but were more in line with interpersonal reactions from managers and staff. Discussions among staff and nurse managers about the taboo subject of medication errors are desperately needed. Also, integrating human factors theory into managerial level educational programs may help managers focus on system redesigns to reduce or eliminate reporting barriers within their organizations.


Finally, systems-oriented and critical thinking should be promoted to enhance nursing judgment to decrease the notion that certain errors do not warrant reporting. All errors including near misses should be reported so that organizations have an opportunity to improve their patient safety programs.


Any practicing nurse knows that the causes of medication errors are both varied and complex. Because medication errors are such a concern to the public, healthcare organizations, and nurses themselves, this study was undertaken to ask nurses about what they believe constitutes a medication error, what is reportable, and what barriers to reporting exist. Additional dialogue and research with nurses are needed. Questions to raise with nurses include the following:


1. How do nurses define medication errors?


2. Is there a unique and different definition for reportable medication errors versus non-reportable errors?


3. Why is there a difference in nursing judgment between reporting medication errors to physicians and reporting medication errors using incident reports?


4. What can organizations do to promote the reporting of medication errors and near misses?


 




While this study has generated some important questions, it also has provided some insights into medication errors and reporting. The knowledge gained from this study can contribute to educational programs that promote the recognition of medication errors. The knowledge also can assist with system redesigns to reduce or eliminate barriers to reporting medication errors. Patient safety programs can be strengthened through timely, accurate, and comprehensive reporting, ultimately ensuring the highest quality patient care.

 


 


 


 

Me_in_cocceticut_max50

25446 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 5 months ago

 

Medical Error Self-Reporting Stifled by Fears of Retaliation


 


It's been established that one effective method for improving patient safety is to create an environment where staff are encouraged to self-report medical errors without fear of retaliation.


So, it was surprising to see a recent HR Solutions survey that found that while 70% of healthcare employees believe they can report a medical/healthcare error caused by a colleague without fear of reprisal, only 54% said they can report an error they themselves have caused without fear of retaliation.


And, only 65% of healthcare employees in the survey said they would be supported by their supervisors if they committed a medical error. The study analyzed survey responses from nearly 300,000 healthcare employees at 160 hospitals and health systems throughout the nation, so this is an impressive sampling.


What does it say about the state of employee relations and engagement if more than half of healthcare employees fear retaliation?


One big obstacle for creating an open, engaged workforce might be workers' fear of retaliation from front line supervisors, says Rick . It's not enough, he says, for a CEO to declare a zero-tolerance policy on retaliation from a lofty perch in the c-suite. That policy has to be instilled in every manager in a healthcare organizations.


"You do it through constant education and constant reinforcement," Lovering says. "I'm a firm believer that the conversation can drive the culture, so if you keep talking about these things and why we don't want to have a punitive response to errors people buy into it."


 


Lovering says AtlantiCare engages its managers as coaches and mentors for the staff they supervise. "So if someone makes a patient safety error that would be a coaching-for-improvement opportunity. That is the way we view it and we have taught our supervisors to view it that way," he says.


But even that isn't enough to protect employee confidence from the occasional "rogue manager," Lovering says. Employees must have a safe outlet to vent their concerns about retaliation. So, AtlantiCare contracted with an outside company that fields Intranet complaints from staff about supervisors – or any other area of hospital operations. Employees who complain have the option of remaining anonymous.


At first, the idea that employees would be able to anonymously complain about their bosses didn't sit well with supervisors. "We heard a lot about 'how am I going to prevent employees from making me look bad, saying things that aren't happening?'"


Lovering says. "I've had very little of that. I tell managers 'if you are creating an environment where employees want to sabotage your career that says something about the environment you are creating.'"


 


Medical Error Self-Reporting Stifled by Fears of Retaliation

 


Where it can get tricky, however, is with the repeat offenders, the worker who repeatedly makes serious medical errors that could endanger patients. Sometimes, those honest errors point to an unpleasant reality.


"Clearly if we had an employee that had multiple errors, ultimately you might have to get past retraining and have a discussion about if they're cut out for that kind of work," Lovering says. "We have been fortunate and not had to go down that road with our staff yet."


AtlantiCare's programs to ease staff anxiety about self-reporting medical errors are similar to the efforts of hundreds of other hospitals across the country. This is not a new issue. So why is there such a high level of distrust among staff, several years into these initiatives? How much of it is residual, and how much of it is warranted?