Everything Nurses >> Nurse Talk >> Amazing Facts About Pregnancy That You May Not Know
Amazing Facts About Pregnancy That You May Not Know
|
25373 posts back to top |
Posted 2 months ago
Pregnancy is one of life’s miracles. You are growing a life, a child inside your body. It’s incredible. I’ve been pregnant 3 times and given birth to three little people and it still amazes me to no end. Your Heart Grows Soften
Feet Can Grow One Full Size Your Sense Of Smell Gets Stronger
Tall Mamas More Likely To Conceive Twins Cravings Can Mean Something More Baby Gets Nutrients Before Mama Dad's Pregnancy Symptoms
|
|
25373 posts back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago
WHY IS NUTRITION IN THE WOMB IMPORTANT?
Young women who eat unvaried and monotonous diets are putting the future health of their children and grandchildren at risk. We are all aware that poor diets are bad for us. What is now known is that the diets of girls and young women determine the health of the next generation.
The fetus receives the nutrition it needs to grow not only from what the mother eats during pregnancy but from the mothers own body. The placenta, which is part of the baby that attaches it to the womb, captures nutrients from the mother’s blood and transports them to the baby. The growth of the placenta and the food it supplies are the key to health for a lifetime. The placenta has three functions. It is the gate between mother and baby, transferring food from the mother and waste from the baby; it makes hormones that signal to the mother what the baby needs; and it protects the baby from the mother’s immune system, which could attack the baby because it is "foreign" to the mother’s body because half of its genes come from the father. The development of the placenta begins when the embryo implants into the lining of the mother’s womb, on the eighth day after conception. The organ becomes fully functional in the tenth week of pregnancy. At birth its surface is oval in shape. It seems that the tissue along the length of the surface has different functions to tissue along the breadth. A baby that is undernourished may try to compensate by expanding the surface of its placenta to extract more nutrients from the mother. This is dangerous because the baby and the placenta have to share the available food between them. A larger placenta will require a larger share. The shape and size of the placental surface predict heart disease, high blood pressure and certain cancers in later life. The predictions vary with the mother’s nutritional state, as she is the ultimate source of food. The predictions also differ in boys and girls. Boys invest less than girls in placental growth but more readily expand the placental surface if they become undernourished. WHY IS NUTRITION IN THE WOMB IMPORTANT? Young women who eat unvaried and monotonous diets are putting the future health of their children and grandchildren at risk. We are all aware that poor diets are bad for us. What is now known is that the diets of girls and young women determine the health of the next generation.
|
|
25373 posts back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago WHAT ARE WE DOING ABOUT IT? PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT The Foundation makes information explaining the science of nutrition in the womb. SCIENCE FOOD CHOICE A collaborative project, studying how and why women make food choices for themselves and their families. It is a partnership between Dr Sarah Hampson, from the Oregon Research Institute in Eugene, and Dr Mary Barker, from the University of Southampton, UK. WOMEN IN OREGON The Klamath Falls Study is the first phase of the Oregon Women’s Study, focused on determining how the diets of women during pregnancy influence placental growth and function. 150 women of child bearing age have been recruited by the OHSU Heart Research Center.
|
|
25373 posts back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago BRAIN DEVELOPMENT Intelligence, the ability to benefit from education, are largely determined before the age of three years. The Barker Foundation supports the Thailand longitudinal study of how growth in the womb, and growth, nutrition and health between birth and three years of age, influence the development of intelligence.
PUBLIC HEALTH
In adverse conditions, due to lack of food, stress or other hardships, living things grow more slowly. Babies are no exception. Studies around the world have now shown that people who had low birthweight are at higher risk of heart disease. This is a graded relation. People who weighed 8 pounds are at higher risk than those who weighed 9 pounds: 6-pound babies are at higher risk than 7 pound ones. The people at risk are those who were small at birth because they grew slowly, rather than because they were born prematurely. Low weight gain in the first two years after birth also increases the risk of later heart disease. Like all living things as they develop babies are plastic and are moulded by the food they receive. This determines how fast they grow and the quality of the systems and structures they develop. During what are called “critical periods” of development undernutrition changes a tissue or system permanently. When the sensitive period is over the effects of undernutrition will have become “hard-wired” in the body, preserved for a lifetime. For most organs and tissues the critical period occurs before birth. Research is showing why people who had low birthweight are more vulnerable to heart disease, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, osteoporosis and certain cancers. In the womb the heart has to pump blood through the placenta, and in small babies the high pressures in the placenta circulation weaken the heart for life. A baby protects the growth of its brain at the expense of other parts of the body, such as the lung and kidney. Protecting these is not an immediate priority as, until birth, the mother performs many of their functions on the baby’s behalf. These organs are ‘traded off’. We are beginning to understand how ‘trading-off’ can permanently change an organ’s function and lead to disease in later life. The organs of people who had low birthweight have reduced functional capacity. These people also have different hormonal profiles and different metabolism when compared with people who were heavier at birth. A baby’s growth does not depend only on what its mother eats each day. That would make it too vulnerable to the mother becoming temporarily short of food or ill. It is nourished by its mother’s muscles, fat and bones. Protein, fat and calcium are released from them each day and then re-incorporated back into the tissues. This process, ‘turnover’, constantly enriches the mother’s blood. A woman’s turnover, and her ability to re-fashion food, are built up in response to her dietary experiences through her life. Experience in early life seems to have the greatest impact. Chronic disease is a legacy from malnutrition and poor living conditions among previous generations of girls and young women. The geography of diabetes, heart disease and stroke within any country was laid down by the malnourished mothers of the past. The composition of a good diet was widely agreed many years ago but today the diets of many girls and young women remain unbalanced and monotonous. Infancy lasts from birth to two years of age. People grow more rapidly during this time than they do at any later age. Almost one quarter of the energy available to an infant is used for growth. The brain remains plastic for some years after birth. Infants who grow slowly tend to achieve less at school and during their working lives and are at increased risk of high blood pressure, heart disease, stroke and diabetes in later life. The growth of living things does not proceed with all possible speed until some mechanical constraint is reached and they can grow no faster. Rather growth is optimized, limited so that the benefits of larger body size are not outweighed by the nutritional costs of growth. At some age around two years a child’s rate of growth becomes ‘set’ by the internal environment and is less sensitive to the day-to-day supply of food. Until then food has commanded the rate of growth. Now the rate of growth commands the need for food. Excess food will not lead to more growth, but to fatness. People who develop chronic diseases grow differently as children. A large group of children born in Helsinki, Finland, has been followed up for 65 years. At eleven years of age those who suffered strokes in later life were short and thin; those who developed heart disease were short and of average fatness; while those who developed diabetes were overweight. These children would not have stood out from other children in the class. What distinguished them was the path of growth by which they had attained their body size. This path was characterised by slow growth in the womb and during the first two years after birth followed, in some children, by rapid ‘compensatory’ weight gain. This path of growth leads to a high proportion of fat to muscle in the body, which is known to predispose to heart disease and diabetes. All children should have their growth charted. This is done routinely in some European countries. The places where life expectancy is longest are those where people are not only healthier but biologically younger. In healthy places seventy-five year old people may be biologically similar to 65 year old people in less healthy places. There are two challenges in later life. One is to avoid age-related diseases, which include heart disease and diabetes: the other is to slow the rate of biological aging. The two challenges are linked but disease is not an inevitable consequence of aging. In later life people who had low birthweight are both at increased risk of disease and are more frail. Today in the western world mothers should trust nature and enter pregnancy with confidence. They are the custodians of a marvellous system handed down to them through millions of years of evolution. Natural selection has honed the system for success. Growth and survival of the baby is a centrepiece of evolutionary strategy. Most of the process is controlled by nature: the egg’s journey to the womb, the embryo’s implantation, the growth of the placenta, all occur without a mother’s knowledge. The long and complex supply line which brings food from the mother to the baby develops without her consent. She is the arena for nature’s performance but she is the source of food that fuels it. If we protect the health and nutrition of girls and young women we can prevent chronic disease in the next generation. Each year the lives of millions of people will be spared. Many more will be saved from chronic ill health.
|
|
25373 posts back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago OVERVIEW Dr. Barker’s work is relevant to both Western countries and the Developing World. In the Western world, many babies remain poorly nourished because their mothers eat diets that are unbalanced in macronutrients and deficient in micronutrients, or because their mothers are excessively thin or overweight. In the Developing World, many girls and young women are chronically malnourished.
THE SCIENCE Dr. David Barker is a physician and researcher. In 1989, with colleagues at the MRC Unit, University of Southampton, he discovered the relationship between birth weight and the lifetime risk for coronary heart disease. He showed that the lower the weight of a baby at birth and during infancy, the higher the risk for coronary heart disease in later life. The risk of heart disease falls across the entire range of birth weight. This implies that normal variations in the transfer of food from mothers to babies have profound long-term implications for the health of the next generation. Later studies showed that low birth weight is associated with an increased risk of hypertension, stroke and type 2 diabetes. This led to the 'Fetal Origins Hypothesis,' which proposes that coronary heart disease, and the diseases related to it, originates through responses to under nutrition during fetal life and infancy. These responses permanently change the body’s structure, physiology and metabolism. The hypothesis is strongly supported by studies in animals. David Barker has published more than three hundred papers and written or edited five books about the developmental origins of chronic disease. Recent findings have shown that a woman’s body composition and diet at the time of conception and during pregnancy have important effects on the subsequent health of her offspring. The risk of later chronic disease is further increased if a baby has low weight gain after birth so that at two years it is thin or stunted. After the age of two, rapid gain in fatness further increases the risk of later coronary heart disease, hypertension and type 2 diabetes. These finding point to the importance of:
|
|
25373 posts back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago
Boys Live Dangerously In The Womb
The growth of every human fetus is constrained by the limited capacity of the mother and placenta to deliver nutrients to it. At birth boys tend to be longer than girls at any placental weight. Boy’s placentas may therefore be more efficient than girls, but may have less reserve capacity. In the womb boys grow faster than girls and are therefore at greater risk of becoming undernourished. Fetal undernutrition leads to small size at birth and cardiovascular disorders, including hypertension, in later life. We studied 2003 men and women aged around 62 years who were born in Helsinki, Finland. 644 had hypertension: we examined their body and placental size at birth. In both sexes, hypertension was associated with low birth weight. In men, hypertension was also associated with a long minor diameter of the placental surface. The dangerous growth strategy of boys may be compounded by the costs of compensatory placental enlargement in late gestation. In women, hypertension was associated with a small placental area, which may reduce nutrient delivery to the fetus. In men hypertension was linked to the mothers’ socioeconomic status, an indicator of their diets: in women it was linked to the mothers’ heights, an indicator of their protein metabolism. Boys’ greater dependence on their mothers’ diets may enable them to capitalize on an improving food supply, but it makes them vulnerable to food shortages. The ultimate manifestation of their dangerous strategies may be that men have higher blood pressures and shorter lives than women. INTRODUCTION Pregnancies are more likely to have bad outcomes if the baby is a boy (Boklage 2005; Ingemarsson 2003; Di Renzo 2007). Boys grow faster than girls from an early stage of gestation, even from before implantation, and this makes them more vulnerable if their nutrition is compromised (Pedersen, 1980; Tanner, 1989). More newborn boys than girls have retarded growth and placental abnormalities and more of them die during the perinatal period (Ingemarsson, 2003; Di Renzo et al, 2007). In the famine in Holland during the Second World War the number of boys born fell in relation to the number of girls (Ravelli et al, 1999). The nutrition of a fetus depends on various aspects of the mother’s nutrition, including her diet, her nutritional stores and her metabolism, which is the product of her lifetime’s nutrition (Jackson, 2000). Fetal nutrition also depends on the placenta’s ability to transport nutrients from mother to fetus (Harding, 2001). This ability is reflected in its size. Small babies generally have small placentas. We have previously examined the differences in fetal and placental size at birth among boys and girls born in Helsinki, Finland (Forsen et al, 1999). We found that the small differences in average body measurements concealed large differences in body proportions. Boys tended to be longer than girls at any placental weight. This suggests that boy’s placentas are more efficient but may have less reserve capacity, which increases their vulnerability to undernutrition. Boys tend to have larger head circumferences at birth but are thinner than girls. This suggests that they may trade off visceral development to protect brain growth. The growth of every human fetus is constrained by the limited capacity of the mother and placenta to deliver nutrients to it (Ounsted et al, 1986). The male fetus, by growing more rapidly and investing in brain growth rather than placental growth, is adopting a more dangerous strategy that puts it at greater risk of becoming undernourished. An immediate consequence of fetal undernutrition is reduced growth and low birthweight (Harding, 2001) ; a long-term consequence is vulnerability to cardiovascular disorders, including hypertension, later in life (Barker, 1995). Men and women whose birth weights were towards the lower end of the normal range are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (Barker et al. 1989; Frankel et al, 1996; Rich-Edwards et al, 1997; Leon et al, 1998; Barker et al, 2005). This is thought to reflect fetal programming, the process by which early malnutrition leads to lifelong changes in the body’s organs and systems and thereby initiates disease in later life (Barker, 1995; Bateson et al, 2004). Hypertension can be programmed experimentally by manipulating the diets of pregnant animals (Barker et al, 2006). One mechanism underlying the fetal origins of hypertension is a lifelong reduction in the number of nephrons. During development the kidney has low priority because the placenta performs most its functions, and renal development may be traded off to protect more important organs, including the brain. The higher blood pressure of men than women could indicate that boys more readily trade off their kidneys than girls do. Not only are boys more vulnerable to undernutrition than girls, but their different path of intrauterine growth could make them respond to different aspects of maternal nutrition and have different placental growth. We here present findings showing that two markers of maternal nutrition, together with the size of the placenta, program hypertension differently in the two sexes. METHODS The study sample was selected from men and women who were born during 1934 to 1944 in the Helsinki University Central Hospital and who visited infant welfare clinics in the city. Details of the birth records, child welfare clinic records and school health records have been previously described (Barker et al, 2005). Their birth records included birthweight, the mother’s height and data on the father’s occupation, grouped into middle and lower class, on the basis of an original classification from Statistics Finland. The records also included the weight of the placenta, together with the maximal width of the surface and a lesser width bisecting it at right angles. The mean values of the maximal and lesser diameters were 19.4 (SD 2.2) and 16.9 cm (SD 2.2), respectively. Their lengths were highly correlated with each other (r=0.6) and with birthweight (r=0.5). We used these so-called diameters to estimate the surface area of the placenta. Assuming an elliptical surface, we estimated the area of the placenta as maximal x lesser diameter x π/4. We identified 8760 men and women, born as singletons, who were living in Finland in 1971, when a unique identification number was allocated to each member of the Finnish population. We used random number tables to select a sample of people within the cohort who were still alive and living in Finland. In order to achieve a sample size in excess of 2000 people we selected 2902 subjects and invited them to a clinic. 928 men and 1075 women visited the clinic, which was held at the National Public Health Institute in Helsinki. Their average age was 62 years (range 57 to 70 yr). The procedures used at the clinic have been previously described (Barker et al, 2005). Written informed consent was obtained from each subject before any procedures were carried out. The Ethics Committee at the National Public Health Institute, Finland approved the study. Six hundred forty-four of the subjects, 310 men and 334 women, had been diagnosed as having hypertension giving a prevalence of 32% (Eriksson et al, 2007). We calculated odds ratios for hypertension and assessed their associations with maternal and placental measurements using multiple logistic regressions. Odds ratios for hypertension increased with age and waist circumference and we adjusted for these as in our previous analyses (Eriksson et al, 2007). Measurements of birth, placental and maternal size were analysed as continuous variables although presented in Table 1 as groups. Tests for interaction used the product of the variables being studied. .
|
