Everything Nurses >> Nurse Talk >> Stem Cells...Where Do You Stand?

+2

Stem Cells...Where Do You Stand?

264 Views
12 Replies Flag as inappropriate
N3207050_38908984_8699_max50

201 posts

back to top

Posted almost 5 years ago

 

New research regarding stem cells seems to emerge daily. What are your thoughts on the topic? Should scientists be able to use stem cells to research diseased like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's? Or are stem cells off-limits?

Health_screening_by_john_max50

5 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 5 years ago

 

Yes...I beleive that stem cell research has a very promising potential, though we have to work through the controversy..

-1 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 5 years ago

 

Stem cells are readily available from discarded cord blood at childbirtrh.  This is a readily legal and available supply.  I don't understand why more of it isn't harvested.

J0423100_max50

529 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 5 years ago

 

Kittyrn says ...



Stem cells are readily available from discarded cord blood at childbirtrh.  This is a readily legal and available supply.  I don't understand why more of it isn't harvested.



That's exactly the point I was going to make. I think it's a great use of the blood from the umbilical cord. With that said, I also think getting stem cells other ways is ok so long as you aren't doing any more harm to the person or animal. But I am very much against the harvesting of stem cells from embryos from women who have been PAID to create (with a little help, of course!) and carry the fetus until it is developed enough to be used for stem cell research (by abortion). It's disgusting. I don't know of that happening in the US, but it is a pretty lucrative "business" in some other countries. I wish I could find the article on it I read about 8 months ago.

0 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 5 years ago

 

I completely agree with you, emtpixie. I feel like it's a wonderful resource if harvested from other sources than aborted fetuses.

06-05-08_0751_1__max50

64 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 5 years ago

 

Stem cell research when done ethically and morally is another fantastic step in the progress of medicine. 

-57 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 5 years ago

 

After watching my father suffer from parkinson's disease for quite a long time, I'm all for stem cell research

-57 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 5 years ago

 

After watching my father suffer from parkinson's disease for quite a long time, I'm all for stem cell research and use

Rn_max50

1706 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 5 years ago

 

 I am 100% FOR stem cell research. maybe 200%


A busy RN is here

Ellis_2_email_max50

94 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 5 years ago

 

For!  For!! For!!!


What great innovations & healings are we missing because of politics?

Photo_user_blank_big

70 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 5 years ago

 

I agree stem cell research and usage if obtained by means other than abortion can and should be an important part of medicine.  But could the reason so many "groups" are opposed to it be that if more diseases are cured there won't be need of high cost medications and treatments?  It seems that the ones that would lose the most are the ones protesting it the most. 


I could be wrong.....

J0423100_max50

529 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 5 years ago

 

ematthews89 says ...



"I agree stem cell research and usage if obtained by means other than abortion can and should be an important part of medicine.  But could the reason so many "groups" are opposed to it be that if more diseases are cured there won't be need of high cost medications and treatments?  It seems that the ones that would lose the most are the ones protesting it the most. 


I could be wrong....."


Excellent point! Unfortunately Big Pharm (and the Gov't.) are more interested in their bank accounts than in curing people. I read an article in a medical newspaper about 3 years ago that said we know of about 3,000 CURES for most cancers. But do we have them? NO! Why? Because Big Pharm is happy making TONS of money on mediocre treatments that may or may not work (not to mention the side effects). I know there are those of you out there who think I'm nuts, but I urge you to research it before you judge (hint: check out cancer death rates in Sweden, and the differences in treatments).