Group Forums >> Nurses Who Want To Change The World! >> How do you feel about having a National Nurse?
How do you feel about having a National Nurse?
|
8 posts back to top |
Posted about 1 year ago Since this forum is for nurses who want to change the world, I want to be sure you all are aware of a very important effort going on right now. A small group of concerned nurses have been working hard to create an Office of a National Nurse. The role of this highly visible nurse would be to spearhead a cultural shift in our nation to focus on prevention. Nurses know how important prevention is...and know the positive outcomes that can be accomplished. Nurses are trusted by the public, they have skills to help people make changes in their behaviors. The National Nurse supporters think that these facts make nurses a logical group to generate and lead more prevention efforts at the local level. They envision the National Nurse would provide the leadership and guidance to nurses everywhere (including student nurses and retirees) who want to volunteer in their communities to promote prevention activity. This might be by joining the Medical Reserve Corps, or working with disease specific organizations like the American Cancer Society or the Amercian Heart Association or Diabetic Association. Many wonderful materials and programs consistent with evidence based approaches already exist.... but often lack credible messengers. Nurses can be those messengers and already have the skills and knowledge to do it very effectively. Nurses who volunteer will gain a higher level of personal satisfaction by feeling unified with other nurses and contributing to the health of their community... and they'll enhance the image of nursing and serve as visible role models of the many roles of professional nursing as they work within their community. Youth will see nurses in a new light, as role models for community activism, as teachers and mentors for community health. Seeing this expanded role of traditional nursing may postitively affect recruitment. If this Vision of a National Nurse and campaign for Prevention appeals to you... Please visit the National Nursing Network Organization website at www.nationalnurse.org See the long list of supporters for this movement... sign up for the newsletter...join the campaign. Help us make changes that will result in having a National Nurse for Prevention in Washington. During the current window of opportunity for healthcare reform, the power of nurses can make this happen! Now is the time.... join us. Susan Sullivan RN PHN MSN
|
|
Account Removed -16 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Many of us here have been advocating the Office of the National Nurse. Thanks for supporting this effort. I don't want to change the world, just make it better. |
|
160 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Susu says ...
|
|
Account Removed -16 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago ANA routinely only supports what makes them more powerful, so I doubt you will see ANA support the office of a National Nurse. |
|
160 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Got it, kinda figured it was something to that effect, but didn't know for sure... Thanks, D |
|
8 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Amy and Deb...thank you for commenting on my post regarding the pending creation of a National Nurse. It has been very difficult for our National Nursing Network Organization Board members to ascertain why the ANA will not embrace this vision with us... perhaps your suspicions are correct. Unfortunately, since they have continually refused to meet with us, and we have been unable to get them to dialog or participate in conference to discuss their concnerns, we remain perplexed regarding their resistance. They did cite concerns based on misinformation that the Office of the National Nurse would create new competing entities, or compete for funding, or duplicate existing services. And they posted these outdated concerns after they had been addressed in an online letter, and convinced several other nursing organiztions to sign on. However, they also requested HHS Sec Leavitt to upgrade the CNO of the USPHS and grant full time status to the position. Their objection seems centered on the plan for title change that would bestow the unique status of "National Nurse" on this entity. Yet we feel that unique title is key to raise the visibility of professional nursing, increase public awareness and bestow prominence that will be needed to spearhead the philosophical shift to prevention in our nation. Having a National Nurse will enhance recruitment of youth to nursing and other health professions, and will assure nursing it's rightful place at the table where healthcare policy planning takes place. We will continue to pursue this important campaign, and welcome support of nurses across all specialty areas. The vision of a "National Nurse" seems to have a unifying effect on most nurses including students and retirees, resulting in growing enthusiasm as more nurses get involved. Interested nurses can subscribe to the frequently updated newsletter and blog at www.nationalnurse.org. |
|
3278 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago susu: sorry I missed this post. I see you put it up 17 days ago. This is good news that you are working so hard on this effort. Ginny |
|
160 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago I found an article by Anne Nowlin that gave me a little insight. It pretty much covers what you have already said. They skirt around the issue and say that anything that makes nursing more visible and or credible is a plus for the profession. Yet, they do not endorse the idea. What a contradiction! I will look into things further... Here is the link: practitioners.advanceweb.com/Article/National-Nurse-Debate.aspx">http://nurse-practitioners.advanceweb.com/Article/National-Nurse-Debate.aspx and an except from the article re: ANA's position (or lack thereof!):
Thanks for the food for thought! |
|
3278 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago annie is a member on here and I am sure that she can give us some feedback on this topic. Ginny |
|
160 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago practitioners.advanceweb.com/Article/National-Nurse-Debate.aspx">nurse-practitioners.advanceweb.com/Article/National-Nurse-Debate.aspx OOPS! didn't realize you had to put links in like this...this should work. I would love any insight she has on this subject...thanks CD! (May I call you that?) |
|
160 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago chd123 says ...
|
|
3278 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago you can call me cd, you can call me Ginny, you can call me Ginger. I just sent an email to annie to come join this topic Ginny |
|
160 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Thank you very much! Just reminded me of something my grandmother always said... You can call me Donna, you can call me Don, you can call me sweetheart, just don't call me late for dinner... Anyhow, can't wait to hear from her... |
|
212 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago This is great, thanks! "a day without freckles is like a night without stars" |
|
351 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago How do I feel about a National Nurse (NN)? I feel that we nurses know so much more than we give ourselves credit for. We also know much more than physicians do about certain things. Nursing is a science unto itself. Having said that, there are areas in which nurses should not tread and we have to make sure NOT to step over the nurse practice acts of our states. I feel that a NN is an idea who's time has come; not gone, but should be given serious thought right now. I see that best use of a NN as a nurse to work alongside the Surgeon General to work with his agenda. Given the massive increase in healthcare expenditures (currently at 17%) over some years, many nurses feel that a greater emphasis should be placed on prevention. Our country spends 95% of it's health care dollar on treating illness, AFTER it's been diagnosed. In comparison, it only spends 5% of that same health care dollar preventing the illness in the first place; the illness which may have dangerous sequellae, financially devastating side effects, and mortality. It needn't be that way. Nurses have the ability to teach the prevention of illness of disease. Given that in Gallup polls of the last few years people rated nurses as 'top' or first in trust, nurses should 'use' that for the good of their patients. Besides working with the Surgeon General on the national level with his agenda, the NN would coordinate the states and a nextwork of volunteers (nurses) who would speak at churches, synagogues, libraries on a regular basis (about 3-4 times yearly, or more if they wanted) about how to prevent illness. The NN is not an attempt to replace physicians as teachers, or a way to 'become a junior doctor;' rather, nurses in favor of a NN feel that patients can benefit from receiving teaching in many settings, from physicians, from their nurses, in the hospitals. A NN would aim first and foremost to educate people on preventing illness, focusing on wellness strategies and teaching patients reachable and realistic goals to achieve their optimum health. There is currently a movement underway to establish an office of the NN. For more information, please e-mail: teri@nationalnurse.info or visit the NN website at: Annie |
|
351 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago dmazment says ...
The ANA does not support the Office of a National Nurse. It was all I could do to get a quote from them in regards to the NN. They feel partially that they represent the nations' nurses, so there would be a duplication of services ......... |
|
351 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago chd123 says ...
|
|
8 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago
|
|
Account Removed -16 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago I am not now, nor have I ever been a member of ANA. They have never represented my interests as a nurse and they turned me against them 30 years ago, when they began the push to do away with team nursing and promote primary care. Many of my friends and I began thinking of a national nurse over 15 years ago, when CNA in California began to talk about it. We all thought it was a wonderful idea and we all still do. |
|
160 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Wow...thanks for all of the great information. Thanks again Susu! Thanks, Team RN! Dmazement...I have only been a nurse for three years but joined ANA right away, was a member of my student org as well. Is it specifically ANA that you do not agree with? I think it serves a purpose, for sure...I am more politically active as a nurse, I look at the issues that are affecting nurses more closely, my dollars support my state org as well. I am a huge believer in professional organizations and am just looking for some feedback as to why a nurse may not feel that the largest nursing organization does not represent them. (If you would be so kind) Maybe there is something that I have been failing to see/notice? |
|
351 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Susu says ...
Susu, I feel you're right about the ANA being reluctant, close to recalcitrant about forming a united collaboration. As you say, nurses and society deserve no less. Unfortunately, that is the SAME quote (mildly different verbage) that Michelle Artz gave me when I wrote an article for Teri on the NN for ADVANCE. Annie |
|
Account Removed -16 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago chd123 says ...
It's my opinion only chd, but so you know I did all those things and still do them without being in ANA's pocket. I actively am supporting the National Nurse and hope it happens within the next few years. |
