Everything Nurses >> Nursing Polls >> Poll: Universal Health Care. What is your stance?
Poll: Universal Health Care. What is your stance?
Poll: Should the United States adopt universal healthcare?
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
Posted over 4 years ago This was a hot topic during the recent election. What do y'all think? |
|
23 posts back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago Why should the USA repeat the disasters that are the healthcare systems of Canada and the UK? |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago Sorry but I have some small huge questions? Are you worried at all about what the government is doing with health care? Well, I am, a lot! I just feel that everyone in government is out of touch with the true problem! I feel the problem is simple "supply and demand" right! There is no supply of nurses so the demand goes up right along with the prices of health care! So instead of government trying to train more nurses and drive the price down they decide to try to take over and pay for everything! Surprising I know! So what does paying for health care do for us...hospitals are already on hiring freezes and overworking the nurses they have. Meanwhile the truely sick are not going to the hospitals. So what does the government think paying for health care is going to do for nurses?! Umm am I the only one that thinks paying up more money the government doesnt have is a stupid non-permanent solutions to a huge problem that will only get worse for nurses! We are the number one MOST IMPORTANT element in the health care industry, we are possible the most IN DEMAND career in this nation, but who is speaking out for US who is in Washington telling our nations leaders, this is what nurses fight everyday. How is this new plan going to change anything for nurses? On top of that what is paying for health care matter if there are not enough nurse or none to care for Health? Unions kind of protect some of us from hospital administrations but if the government takes over WHO will protect us from the government? Is socialized medicine good for nurses? These are answers we need and I know no one has all the answers but but what do you think? I want to know what others think and if I have to go to Washington I will to find the answers for myself and others, I will totally fight for our cause we need to be all together on this one for the true health of our nation, both the nations financial and physical health. I would like to get a support group going so we are heard and so we can get the answers we just need to have our voice heard we need representation for our profession! |
|
1306 posts back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago I am totally against universal health care. I have friends in Canada and lived in England for 4 years.........THEY dont like it. They have long wait lists for surgical procedures, long wait lists for referrals to specialists.........how can this be good? There was a guy in England <this was from Good Morning America a few monthes back> who hated it. He suffered from an unhealed ankle fracture <the pins got infected after the original surgery, the surgical date was over 2 monthes after the accident or something like that>. He was a smoker, was not able to quit and being 'noncompliant' was among the reasons they refused to redo the surgery. <I hate smoking but I also hate being dictated to>. If we were to get universal health care, there goes another one of our rights down the tube. I hope all those people who have been griping about wanting this system is happy once we get it............and I'm sure we will. If our tax dollars are paying for abortions all over the planet, why not give healthcare to just anybody even though they might be deadbeats.............drug users, alcoholics, yadda yadda yadda. This might be a way for these 'abusers' get healthcare of substandard quality........and they just cant seem to get medicare <they forget you sort of need to pay taxes for medicare> or medicaide <lots of paperwork that only aliens can figure out>. But now THIS..........no brainer, you only need to be human to get it? This is making me just as mad as the stimulus thing. Ok, yall go ahead and blast me.......I wont lose a second of sleep over it! We only have one heart, take care of it! Angie |
|
493 posts back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago Angie What stimulus thing is upsetting you? The Corporate bailouts or the supposed 5,000 going to "everyone"? Just a question, maybe I don't know enough about them. "Softly. deftly, music shall caress you. Feel it, hear it, secretly possess you...." |
|
Account Removed -57 posts back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago I'm not pro universal healthcare. I am pro stepping in putting a cap on premiums, co-pays and above all insurance companies do not have the right to say no on any treatments considered experimental. I'm also on the side of stepping in and telling pharmaceutical companies to lower their prices drastically.
angie we were far more apt to lose our freedom of speech under the former president than Mr Obama. |
|
1306 posts back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago Nursejenny1310 says ...
All of the above. Dont forget they are still doing bonuses for the ceo's.........I did a post on the stimulus thread that will upset people probably. We only have one heart, take care of it! Angie |
|
7 posts back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago The last thing I want is the government involved in my healthcare. As a nurse in managed care, I see how" well" they have done managing Medicare and Medicaid--ugh. The waste is unbelievable and it's all legislated. Medicaid members are not held responsible for anything. Every time they go to the ER even if we deny the charges and don't pay the hospital, the Medicaid recipients have no liability. So every visit for a pregnancy test, or a cold or STD check (non emergent visits), gets shunted to those of us who have insurance and we pay more. |
|
6 posts back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago Universal healthcare (socialized medicine) should be avoided at all costs. First, it does not work. Period. Talk with people in countries that have it (UK, Canada) and you will find out that people do not get the care that they need. They wait weeks to months for tests and procedures. They DIE waiting.
The quality of care will decrease because the government is not interested in the well-being of the people in this country. The government is interested in making more money and getting bigger. The government is not interested in which medication will best control Mr. Smith's BP or Mrs. Jones' MS. It is interested in how much those medications cost. Mr. Smith and Mrs. Jones lose in the end. The government will interfere by telling physicians how to treat their patients and what procedures are allowed to be performed. Clearly this is not good for the patients.
Secondly, this is an invasion of privacy. If the government controls the insurance, they have access to everyone's private medical records and if everything is in a national database, then everyone's records are vulnerable to manipulation and identity theft. (Ever watch the movie "The Net"? A little scary, isn't it?) So what about HIPPA? Seems useless if the government controls healthcare.
I suggest that aool of the wise healthcare professionals, who understand that socialized medicine is a huge step in the wrong direction, get together to tell the weasels in Washington that we don't want this! It will not work! ~FarmgirlNJ I'll keep my freedom, my guns, my religion and my money. You keep the CHANGE! |
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago This country tried allowing corporations to police themselves and look what happened. We are in another Depression because someone had the idea that corporations and CEO's were really in it for the benefit of the consumers. BS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They are only in it for the money. The same goes for insurance companies, managed care, pharmacy companies, etc. Healthcare should never be for profit. Period. You say that nationalized healthcare is worse; but is it any worse than what we have in this country? I work in an ER. The majority of our business these days is people who have NO MONEY, NO INSURANCE, and there's not a private doctor around that will see them for any less than $250 in the office. So you say that at least we are FREE to choose who we want to go to and where. Really ? My insurance company limits compensation if I go outside my "network". So I either see a doctor inside the contract that I may or may not like and may or may not be a good doctor or I go outside the contract and end up footing more of the bill, which I may or may not be able to afford. I'm sorry, but where's the freedom in that? Medicare and Medicaid patients see who they want, when they want and don't have to worry about the bill and how much will be left for them to pay when it's over. Medicare patients have a one time a year deductible. Medicaid patients pay nothing out of pocket except the occasional pharmacy fee, which in my state is limited to $10 if you're on the Medicaid roles. I not only pay a deductible with my insurance, but then I pay a percentage after the insurance company has paid which ramps up when I see a specialist. I recently had surgery. My out of pocket expenses will be in the approximate range of $2-3000. I will be paying for this surgery for the next 3 years if I make payment arrangements, which I will have to do. After a period of time, the practice will get tired of keeping my account on their books and will ship me out to a "collection specialist" who will then void the arrangements I made with the practice and come after me for the balance, paid in full. I will spend days on the phone making new arrangements, which will cut into my off time. Where's the freedom in that? You say I could practice health and wellness. Which I do. I do change those things I can change. However, genes cannot be changed and unfortunately, my family gave me the ability to suffer from severe asthma which means a lot of doctors and occasional hospital stays. Where's the freedom in that? My rant is to focus attention on the fact that a lot of the things that people scream freedom and choice over are not free to choose amongst the now millions of Americans who cannot afford to play the Monoply game of healthcare. And as long as corporate CEO's can afford to chose, we will never be able to afford them. But interjecting the government may bring an end to the domination of the "free" market and bring some sanity back into healthcare, meaning that those of us who are healthcare providers can actually get back into the business of health CARE, without worrying about the cost, about the fact that I'm going to get chewed out by my manager because, if I stay another 15 minutes to explain to this elderly, hard of hearing patient about her medicines, I'm going to be in overtime and the corporate office has cut all overtime for ANY reason. And yet, if I didn't have to worry about that, I could patiently and slowly explain to her what medicines she can take and what ones she should no longer take and what foods could interact and how she should talk to the pharmacist before she buys that OTC med because it might interact with her prescribed medicines, killing her and causing her family to bring a lawsuit against myself and the prescribing doctor because WE DIDN'T TAKE THE TIME TO EXPLAIN THIS TO HER!!!!!!!!!!!!!! As for the home health nurse that said dealing with Medicare and Medicaid is a pain- my mother was a member of Kaiser Permanente in the 80's and early 90's before they pulled away from the East coast. Some of the worst healthcare she received was under this entity. Twice she had severe allergic reactions to medications prescribed without anyone taking the time to explain anything to her because managed care is all about how fast can we shove the patient through. Since she's been on Medicare, she has been able, with the help of her family MD, come off all her medicines, is healthier now than at any stage of her life and is wishing she could go back and do it all again. It's because the doctors, under Medicare, already know they aren't going to make a fortune and are in it because of the reason they went to medical school to start with-because they want to help heal people. HMO's and managed care are in it for the bucks and it's all about how fast, how short and how cheap we can do this. But there's freedom in that, right??
|
|
6 posts back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago Here is an article that goes into some detail about our wonderful government's new healthcare bill. If this doesn't scare you then maybe we should check you for a pulse! This cannot be beneficial to our patients, especially the elderly. Reading about this makes my eyes bleed! Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan: Betsy McCaughey This is very disturbing: "But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446)." How about this...it might change the type of care that our long term patients receive: "Daschle says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt." "Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe and effective. The stimulus bill would change that and apply a cost- effectiveness standard set by the Federal Council (464)." "The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis." "In 2006, a U.K. health board decreed that elderly patients with macular degeneration had to wait until they went blind in one eye before they could get a costly new drug to save the other eye. It took almost three years of public protests before the board reversed its decision." This will not be profitable for hospitals or other facilities: "Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face penalties. “Meaningful user” isn’t defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time” (511, 518, 540-541)"
~FarmgirlNJ I'll keep my freedom, my guns, my religion and my money. You keep the CHANGE! |
|
1306 posts back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago drsigman: you are wanting everybody to have something for nothing. Those CEO'S you, me and millions of Americans hate at least have a job. This country is founded on people who want to make a success with their life. What if Henry Ford didn't begin his business because he didn't want to pay his employees? Why whould the govt punish successful people by taking their wealth away from them? I know there are the CEO's who are crooked theives <Wall st bailout, etc.>. I still dont want universal healthcare............I think it socialist. We only have one heart, take care of it! Angie |
|
Account Removed -1 posts back to top |
| Posted over 4 years ago LOL, if you think that if we have universal health care you are going to get 'freedom of choice'. If the government sets it up, you can believe that you'll get who they assign you, or be prepared for a LOOOOONG wait. It'll all be set up like a big HMO in the end. |