Everything Nurses >> Nursing Politics/Activism >> How do nurses feel about universal healthcare?
How do nurses feel about universal healthcare?
|
453 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago
katiesuern says ...
Hardworking people should be rewarded, not taxed to support everyone. This will also, I fear, encourage alot of people to not want to work, since there will be no incentives or reasons to do so. Our system does need fixing, but universal healthcare is not the answer. Claire Kruszka |
|
17 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago In response to the article I posted,one has to wonder,WHY is the AMA adamently opposed to Gov supported Healthcare? See this article- http://www.democracynow.org/2009/6/16/dr_chris_mccoy_dear_ama_i A friend of mine,a physician who heads up endocrinology at a major Mass hospital,says (simplified)it's because the current healthcare chaos benefits them finincially on various levels.She also has made very unflattering observation about the AMA,and feels they have a conflict of interest (not neccessarily intentionally)with the patient body they are supposed to care for.She is a very conscientious,talented Harvard trained Physician. And just to clarify,the Gov Healthcare option Obama is advocating for is not a plan forced on everyone,BUT IS AN OPTIONAL plan only. It is a GOVERMENT SPONSERED HEALTHCARE OPTION only,people.For those who can't afford or need better insurence,ironically,like me and many other nurses I know because various nursing organizations REFUSE to offer group healthcare for nurses(did anyone ever wonder what is going on with that(?)) As I expected,I think the opposition is using some interesting and incorrect scare tactics,(sorta like Bush did inadvertently to get us to war with Iraq)(!) There,enough said,for better or worse... -Sarah |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago sarahndipity723 says ...
I would still far rather have a member of the AMA making my medical decisions than an uneducated (medically), unelected, unacountable bureaucrat. And yes Doctors are intrested in things that benefit them financially -- it's called the profit motive, Do you seriously believe that they endure the time, effort and expense of medical school along with the living Hell most residency programs represent merely for the sheer joy of serving their fellow man? Smell the coffee. |
|
453 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago WBatley214 says ...
I have to say you are right on that score. Why shouldn't doctors make money? As nurses we enjoy being paid for our work and expertise also. That's why we went to school. I do have compassion and care for my patients, but I have bills to pay. The press is demonizing the AMA and making them appear "greedy". How about we give their stories away for free? I mean how dare they expect to be paid for just telling us the news. You have to take what the media reports with a grain of salt, and unfortunately make your own conclusions. Claire Kruszka |
|
17 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago
"...I would still far rather have a member of the AMA making my medical decisions than an uneducated (medically), unelected, unacountable bureaucrat" WBatley WBatley:It is very curious to me that you made that comment,because in reality,any potential member of the AMA is too far removed from very many fundamental day to day healthcare decisions.Sure,sometimes the Dr writes the order,(often it's a NP or PA)but guess who gets to play God and choose choose whether that get this med or that,are eligible for this surgery or that,or is qualified for the cancer Tx?The bureaucrat,in this case,the insurence company exec or staff IS in the drivers seat.I beg to differ with you,but if I may,I think ya have things backwards.The tail wags the dog as it stand now,of seen some frightening manifestions of this on a cardiac unit. That physician I made reference to in my last post said the INSURENCE companies by default control so very much of her practice,and by default,make so many healthcare decisions for the pt. today (MANY WHICH SHE FEELS ARE NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PT)she states if she knew this scenario would occur thirty yrs ago before her kids went to Medical School,she would NEVER have encouraged them to be Dr's.She is,as I am, very troubled by this conflict of interest(making money vs treating pt)that rears it's ugly head every day in the life of people like herself involved in American medical care today. -To clarify-You are missing the point,which is:Re the bigger pic,I am not referring to the Dr's making money,that is my friend's(a DR. herself) rather cynical view of the AMA.I am talking about the fundamental conflict of interest ,or proverbial,"Fox in the chicken coop",we currently have set up with health insurence co.'s running the show,it is having a devastating effect on our healthcare system,economy,and nat'l health. -sarah
|
|
453 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Sarah, The AMA is a group of doctors who look out for the interest of their profession.How are they far removed? I worked in 2 different MD offices for 4 yeras, and it was unbelievable how on hands they were about cost decisions in their practice. Part of the reason healthcare is so high , is doctors have to run unecessary labs and tests to make sure they don't get sued. This has helped run up the cost. The govt won't dare put caps on malpractice suits. Guess that's cause a majority of them are lawyers. Who's being greedy? I wager to guess lawyers have a sleazier reputation than doctors do when it comes to making a profit. When Obama made his speech to the AMA they booed him b/c he said he would not put caps on malpractice. So, everyone will get healthcare, and they can still sue their doctors for millions? Who is going to want to practice medicine? Claire Kruszka |
|
17 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Claire,I'm talking about the larger pic,how much time Dr's spend with pt's,what drugs are covered,many healthcare decision have nothing to do with Dr's,but are determined by bureacracy(health insurence exec's who also look at their profit margins). That's why the Dr. friend I refer to is so upset about medicine today.At least with a Gov option,those decision would be made by people with healthcare backgrounds not MBA'a. And again(Claire),my own Dr. satrted a sort of "co op" with other Dr's and takes veruy little insurence,he managed to have more control of his practice that way,perhaps that's what your former employers have done.According to my Dr friend,that is not the norm today. -sarah |
|
Account Removed -1 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Its the lawyers that drive up the cost of healthcare. I took my Mom to the Dr's. She has medicare, and medicare paid $78 for an office visit. I went to a Lawyer with my parents to have 2 POA's, and a consultation for a family issue RE their care, and the bill was over $700. When we take the Lawyer's out of medical issues, the cost of medical care will come down. TOO many lawsuits, and most of the money doesn't even go to the victim. |
|
7 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago I am totally against universal healthcare. My sister lives in England where one first makes an appointment with a nurse (which doesn't mean one is seen immediately by the way). If nurse thinks necessary, one may get to see the doctor. Perhaps finding a way to get some of our young people off of Medicaid that refuse to practice birth control might help as well as those who are not compliant with diet and medication being refused any further benefits that the working poor of us are picking up the tab for. Geez, I can think of lots of things wrong with the system but letting the government take over would be heaving insult to the injury we have. |
|
1306 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago ckruszka says ...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080515121649AAhd2hy" class="L4">What is a fascist?
I did a quickie search for your convenience as well. I didnt write it, I just did the old cut and paste thingie. I have gotten other things in my emails a “He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.” Its no big secret that Obama bases most of his appeal with youth voters. This is a common occurrence in the history of the rise of tyrants. Most are supported fervently by the young. Hitler famously used this technique to gain power. The tyrant-to-be must hide his true ambitions behind a mask of emotional appeal in order to seduce the gullible and unwary. The youth most often falls into this category, not yet “broken in” to the number one rule in electing a ruler: watch their actions, not their lips. “The leader of genius must have the ability to make different opponents appear as if they belonged to one category.” bout Obama being like Hitler..........Im glad I remembered which evil tyrant was in that email because I dont feel like lookin up Musolini and those other idiots.
Did anybody else see Helen Thomas <she's the reporter who was probably doing the White House circuit since Nixon? not sure, she's been around.................well Helen and Chip Reid were running circles around nobamas press secretary, Gibbs...................well, it started with Major Garrett who asked Obama why he waited so long to respond to Iran's election.........and the protesters getting shot and beaten , but nobama likes the Iranians..........and when Major asked that difficult question, it was like JOURNALISTS GONE WILD, lol. Im proud of Helen, and she is not a 'faux' regualar...............I dont think Fox like her at all, to tell you the truth. Helen accused the president of staging what was suppose to be a town hall thingie and it was suppose to be 'open forum'...........but obama had invites, so he's still planting who he wanted to speak. I bet Gibbs gets fired next. Back to the topic of universal health............in yesterday's forum with the president, when he was asked 'how much is it going to cost in taxes'............he didnt know.................when somebody asked how much will the government save by using his plan............'he didnt know'. Why am I not surprised?? We only have one heart, take care of it! Angie |
|
2085 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago angienwgeorgia says ...
Don't you think that when you propose something as huge as universal health care, you should know the cost? John L. Racher RN, BSN, MSRN-BC
One should study Philosophy, Archeology and History: Because
|
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Nurse_John says ...
|
|
2085 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Yes Tina, you are correct. They know the cost, but if they told us, then even more people would revolt against it. John L. Racher RN, BSN, MSRN-BC
One should study Philosophy, Archeology and History: Because
|
|
1306 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago I read the articles regarding the discussion with Obama and the AMA...................geez. We just lost a brilliant md with the Mayo Clinic. He wont be the first to go, Im sure. Obama was doing his best to convince those md's..........who are our medical providers that they are greedy and they are going to have to go HIS way. He flat out said what the public think is irrelevant. Well, not in those words but that was the gist of it. People come to our country from Canada because we have better healthcare. I guess we wont have to worry about the canadians much longer. Our docs will be doing career changes.,....................it'll be like the "Exodust" except chariots with warriors wont be chasing them into the red sea. We are going to be our own healthcare provider.............might not be a bad thing. My only concern is how will I be able to get my asthma meds and allergy crap. Those are the only things I have to have on hand at all time, and breathing is sort of important to a gal in these parts! We only have one heart, take care of it! Angie |
|
54 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Sarahndipity, you are so right on! why is it that whenever healthcare for all is mentioned everybody immediately rushes to Canada for comparisons. Can't America come up with it's own brilliant plan to put the Canadians, the Brits and the French to shame? It makes me wonder if the opposition to Universal Healthcare (health care for all Americans, right) wants to keep the status quo of them and us. Those who can afford and those who cannot. Those who did not go to college but perhaps work in vital blue collar positions, for small companies, those who actually like their jobs but whose employers can't afford to offer health benefits--do we say to them, "too bad, you made the choice, change jobs, change careers, drive 100 miles one way to a bigger company." An earlier post from someone mentioned a lack of compassion--and this from nurses! As I told you all before, I lost my job in January. I have put off seeing my specialist because I will not be able to pay for the treatments at this time. Not good--not here in the U.S. |
|
2085 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Maggy, I understand where you are coming from. Health care for all Americans is perfect and should be available. The problem is that it is a fantasy. For one thing, the cost is prohibited, in fact the obama administration will not even tell us what their plan costs. Another thing, do you really think that the people in any of the professions that earn a lot of money will want to dig into their pockets to pay the taxes it would take to run a universal health care? The reason that everyone brings up Canada, Great Briton, and France is because they are the ones that worked. No one ever brings up the big one that didn't work....the USSR. Canada's taxes are a lot higher than ours, the french pay about 70% in taxes and the British pay between 75 and 85% of their income in taxes. Do you really want to work your tail off in any job and just get 25% of your income? I know you said you lost your job, but could you have lived on 25% of your take home pay when you were working? The tax burden on everyone is too high already, and adding more for universal healthcare will make it worse. John L. Racher RN, BSN, MSRN-BC
One should study Philosophy, Archeology and History: Because
|
|
54 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago No, I don't want to get just 25% of my salary. I am working now, without benefits, at a job where I make $10.00 an hour less than the job I lost in January. I just truly believe that something CAN be done. Maybe the proposals out there aren't great but we can't go on as is either. I worked with Doc at the USPS for 8 years. He said that when he first started out, he wanted to make as much money as he could. He retired in 2006 and said just before he left that after all the years, he now believed that the US healthcare system was in dire need of a major overhaul. He even mentioned the cursed "Universal Healthcare". I don't mean to sound selfish, I'm just freaking out because in a year or so (after COBRA) I could be facing a no insurance situation and I have too many medical concerns. |
|
2085 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago I am glad you are working now Maggie. I understand that you are not trying to sound selfish, and i do not think you sound selfish at all. Everyone has personal needs and worries about themselfs and their families. That is not selfish. I agree that something needs to be done. I am just not sure what. I am sure, that I do not want the government running my health system. I just think that we need to get everyone that now has an interest in our healthcare system to get on the same page somehow. The government, the insurance companies, the pharmaceutical companies, the doctors the medical manufacturers they all need to stop being so greedy and come to a solution that works. I am not saying they should stop making a profit, after all that is what free enterprise in America is all about. Just that if they all worked together maybe it could happen. I do not think it will, because I think it will be just too expensive. John L. Racher RN, BSN, MSRN-BC
One should study Philosophy, Archeology and History: Because
|
|
1306 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Regarding nobama and the AMA......................Im sorry, I dont think its totally greed on the part of the md's. Im sure the majority of todays docs have student loans up the wazoo, they probably spend a fortune in insurance, taxes that are involved with having a business, employee paychecks............all that stuff. Why should somebody go to the trouble of bettering themself to follow their calling to get their education, spend their time in school to get their degree, try to build up a practice because that's what we do in America, right? We try to prosper as Americans...........we are a capitalist nation. Someone posted that they prefer an educated md to have the authority to approve their procedures rather than an uneducated beurocrat..............I totally agree. What we have become as a nation a country where the public feels they are entitled to the necessities that many of us take for granted. I for one havent always had benefits, I know I do not have that feeling of entitlement, I worked for them, now I have the grace to be thankful that Im physically able to work. There is an area for universal healthcare that I would support. If somebody was physically unable to work due to no fault of their own, then it would be a piss poor world to deny help. I do though do feel there needs to be serious thought as to how a disabled person should qualify. I personally would propose that if someone has a long history of drug/alcohol abuse, smoking...........people need to realize that if you play you pay. I had a friend who spent her life looking for the party. She is 46, a month older than me...............we use to be close friends but we drifted when I was in nursing school. She parties, goes to concerts.........I always hated having to use her home as the the place we crash after a concert because of the smoking <doesnt mix well with asthma>, heavy drinker.........I suspected she did drugs, just not around me. For 3 years now she has been treated for hep c <she is unsure how she got it......maybe iv drug use or lots of sexual partners over the years>...........the last time I heard from her was about 6 monthes ago, she said she finally got medicaide, disability and food stamps. I asked her if she was not able to work, she said she doesnt have the energy. She is also on the list for a liver donor <does medicaide fund organ donations>? Im sorry she is ill, but I dont feel its fair for the people who work should not bear the burden of funding health care for EVERYONE.............there has got to be a limit, there has got to be a stopping point to where the government understands that ITS NOT FAIR. Why should any of us work if we only get 1/4th of what we earned ? Its disheartening. I am a middle class American. I struggled my entire adult life to get to be 'at least middle class'. The middle class are going to be the ones most hurt by taxes...........the taxes that nobama knows yet, the taxes on the environment, the taxes on nobama's date nites with Mrs nobama.........their date nites cost the taxpayers a fortune. Im sick of it. There wasn't a hooplaloo over any of the past presidents with the media going berzerk over date nite. In truth, I cant picture George Bush Senior with his wife on regular date nites...........which is sad because SHE deserved a date nite. We only have one heart, take care of it! Angie |
|
2085 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Angie, although we do not agree on the MD's greed, I do agree with you on people getting on medicade and such when their illness is self inflicted. Everyone knows the hazards of smoking, drinking and drug use. If you smoke for 30 years knowing the health risks and get COPD, or if you drink for 30 years and have liver damage, or take any illegal drugs for 30 years and have hep C or anything else, why should the tax payers pay for your medical bills? John L. Racher RN, BSN, MSRN-BC
One should study Philosophy, Archeology and History: Because
|
|
1306 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago sarahndipity723 says ... In response to the article I posted,one has to wonder,WHY is the AMA adamently opposed to Gov supported Healthcare? A friend of mine,a physician who heads up endocrinology at a major Mass hospital,says (simplified)it's because the current healthcare chaos benefits them finincially on various levels.She also has made very unflattering observation about the AMA,and feels they have a conflict of interest with the patient body they are supposed to care for.She is a very conscientious,talented Harvard trained Physician. -Sarah Regarding why nobama ran into a a group that didnt bow to him: Well, part of it could be when it came to questions............noboma had no answers...........he was asked how much it would cost as a whole,he did not know, he was asked how much it would cost is savings for thier program, he did not know. My belief is that the AMA is against got government takeover like with Wall Street, the Banks, and the Car manufacturers............I feel that the md's doing want the government crawling up their piehole doing the beauracracy thing. Obama wants the control over most everything that controls most of us and I'm against it..............'CAPITALISM IS THE WAY TO GO'....................IF NOT WHY SHOULD THE MD'S STAY ON WITH THE AMA, OR EVEN STAYING A LICENSED MD. WE'LL have many mds leaving, we'll have our patient nurse ratio jump up to about 8 patients/nurse. He gonna run the unions? Heck, thats no worries down here, we dont have unions in geogia. .............Sarah, so your physicean friend from Harvard is willing to give up his rights to his patents care into the care of a beaurocrat? I bet that mds patient load will lighten up if their patients know that the md has to wait until the beurocrat soes his stamp of approval before we can approve your knee replacement, sorry, but the President says its best if he makes your medical decision. It doesnt matter, the middle class wont mind paying for it. I thought that this administration was going to be transparent..............not so, Its the opposite of transparent. Hey, I drove around today and saw no OBAMA bumper stickers! We only have one heart, take care of it! Angie |
|
54 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago What does nobama mean? I agree that people who abuse themselves then expect handouts are a problem, but who would monitor who's abusing themselves? I mean, if a Hep C patient comes in, how would it be decided how that person contracted it? and who would say, well, you can't get medicaid, food stamps etc because you had unprotected sex too many times. When I worked at the USPS as a contracted employee, not eligible for benefits, I saw a few employees come in who had advanced Hep C and were waiting for transplants. It did run across my mind that these guys were Vietnam vets who had probably done their fair share of drinking, drugging and you know what else AND WHY COULDN'T I GET HEALTHCARE BENEFITS WHEN I HADN'T ABUSED MYSELF LIKE THAT? But they were regular employees with regular benefits. Does everyone agree that something has to change? And yes, there is greed. A doctor does spend a lot of time in school and a lot of money setting up a practice, but does he have to expect to make it all back withn the first year? When I lived in Washington State, we had a Kaiser HMO. Some people hated it. we never had one minute's problem with it for the 11 years we lived there. My PCP worked for Kaiser. He was paid a salary by Kaiser and it wasn't enough to be driving BMW's of Jags. He said, he liked not having to worry about the expenses and other hassles of private practice. I'm sure there are many other docs like that who love their work and aren't totally interested in becoming millionaires. |
|
Account Removed -33 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Thanks for insulting veterans on Indepence Day, MaggyC - sounds like someting an ignorant bigot would say. I'm a Vietnam veteran, never used drugs and didn't drink to excess, and whatever other foolish stereotypes you want to trot out. I came home and made something of myself, putting myself through college, nursing school and law school while working to support my family. I guess that doesn't fit into your narrow minded stereotypes, right? Happy Fourth of July. |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Captain Eric, I thought the same thing when I read that. I wondered why would someone assume that Vietnam Veterans are all alcoholics, drug users, etc. I also thought that was a slam. My brother also fought in the Vietnam war and he is not an alcoholic, drug user, etc. And if some people came back and had a hard time, maybe we should have some compassion on them for all that they went through. War is never an easy thing. I can't even imagine what it must have been like. |
|
Account Removed -1 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago
Wow, Wow and OMG Wow again. You OWE your freedom to those soldiers and sailors who served. My brother died in Vietnam. I lived through the 70's where all those HERO's didn't get anything but spit on. I never thought, I'd live to see the day, where those same name calling slugs would ever come up to see the light of day again. Happy 4th, Captain, and thank you for YOUR service. |
|
Account Removed -33 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago Thank you Tina and Kitty, for cheering me up - Happy 4th to you!
|
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago I'm sure it is hard since you already lived it once, but try to remember, not everyone feels the way that MaggyC does. There are so many people that can't express their gratitude toward our military and all that they have done, and all that they continue to do for us!! You guys sacrifice so very much for us and I am truly thankful for heros like you!! I hope your day is special today! :) |
|
54 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago YIKES!! Didn't mean to offend. These 2 employees whom I worked with just happened to be. I also had a girlfriend (non-military) who, in the course of our friendship, told me some of the things she used to do as well--drink too much, ex-heroin and had indiscriminate encounters. She too developed Hep C and was taking Interferon injections at that time. A patient of mine in LTC was scheduled to have surgery and banked a unit of her own blood for an an autologous transfusion. In the course of the prcedure, they gave her a unit that was not her own and she contracted Hep C and died. I know not all vets are drug users> I was simply stating my experience with 2people who, by their own accounts, had brought on their own difficulties with certain behaviors. |
|
54 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago One more thing, please. I just went back over the posts since this topic, "How do nurses feel about universal healthcare?" started. The comments were varied and all insightful. With all the different feelings on the subject, some pretty passionate, we got to approximately 85 posts before the name-calling began (ignorant bigot, narrow-minded). I guess that's doing pretty good. |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted almost 4 years ago MaggyC says ...
Maggy, in your first post, you said that "they were Vietnam Veterans, who had probably done their fair share of drinking, drugging, and you know what else." In your next post, you said that it was "by their own accounts, had brought on their own difficulties." There is a big difference. You also said that it ran across your mind about them being Vietnam Veterans. In my opinion the fact that they were Vietnam Veterans should not have had anything to do with the story. You made it sound like you think Vietnam Veterans are alcoholics and druggies. That is something that is sure to offend a lot of people. The name calling didn't start until you gave the Vietnam Veterans a "name or a title, however you want to look at it." I try to be objective when reading posts, but I have to be honest, I couldn't believe what I had read and had to go back and read it again, to make sure I had read it correctly. That may not have been what you meant, but that is how it came out. Anyway, I hope everyone is have an awesome 4th of July! :) |

