Everything Nurses >> Nursing Politics/Activism >> How do nurses feel about universal healthcare?

+3

How do nurses feel about universal healthcare?

34,479 Views
1,825 Replies Flag as inappropriate
Photo_user_blank_big

284 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Angieof Georgia-


 


Marxist is how you spell it.  Of course there will be rationing there is rationing now.  Insurance companies deny care, test, referrals etc everyday, that is rationing.  They have a limited amount of resources and they dole out care within those parameters.  Ever since DRG's there has been rationing and before that it was fee for service care exclusively and that was rationed by what you could afford.  rationing is the only rational way to provide healthcare it is a service with limited resources.  Limited hospitals, doctors, nurses, Cat scanners, etc.  You can't get all the care you want for yourself or your family there is always a gatekeeeper \assessing if they should pay for it.


when some of you have any kind of constructive idea on how to fix the healthcare system let's see it.  Doing what we have been doing isn't working it is not financially sustainable. 


 


RNprogressive

Picture_021_max50

1306 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

CaptainEricRN says ...



Seems a little silly to try to blame everything on one politician.....


OOOOO, the evil George Bush is at fault for everything!


OOOOO, the evil Bill Clinton is at fault for everything!


HEY! The SYSTEM stinks! It has gotten worse and worse through the years -


Giving the government more power over our lives is NOT going to help!




great post...........the government is not welcome in my home, thank goodness we would never give them room to invade my pradise.  My mortgage has never even been close to the due date, and never skipped out on income tax.  Pointing the finger is not helping anything. BTW, why is universal healthcare getting involved with affirmative action?  I thought this was healthcare......right?  Check out house bill 3200. 



We only have one heart, take care of it!

Angie

Picture_021_max50

1306 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

why does house bill 3200 look like a job description for a prosecuting attorney with experience with methamphetimines?   or somebody prosecuting someone charged with the manufacturing of?


We only have one heart, take care of it!

Angie

Photo_user_blank_big

509 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

hey i suggested we extend medicare to cover the 50 million uninsured but nobody likes that idea HMMM i wonder why? could it be because its a terrible system that is the ultimate in gatekeeping and waste not to mention inefficient and lacking in its options?? pretty much sums up anything that is run by the government.  if HR 3200 is good enough for us than surely it should be good enough for those who are shoving it thru Congress!! as i see it now HR 3200 is good for only one thing and its used in the outhouse!!!

Photo_user_blank_big

284 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

AMA approves of House Bill 3200:  In particular


In particular, we are pleased that the bill:

• Promises to extend coverage to all Americans through health insurance market reforms;

• Provides consumers with a choice of plans through a health insurance exchange;

• Includes essential health insurance reforms such as eliminating coverage denials based on pre-existing conditions;

• Recognizes that fundamental Medicare reforms, including repeal of the sustainable growth rate formula, are essential to the success of broader health system reforms;

• Encourages chronic disease management and care coordination through additional funding for primary care services, without imposing offsetting payment reductions on specialty care;

• Addresses growing physician workforce concerns;

• Strengthens the Medicaid program;

Requires individuals to have health insurance, and provides premium assistance to those who cannot afford it;

Includes prevention and wellness initiatives designed to keep Americans healthy;

• Makes needed improvements to the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative that will enable greater participation by physicians; and

• Initiates significant payment and delivery reforms by encouraging participation in new models such as accountable care organizations and the patient-centered medical home.


Yea, require health insurance, we require car insurance to drive why not health insurance.  Choice of plans duh not universal coverage.


If you want gov out of your lives, don't drive on the roads, don't send your  kids to public school, don't breathe the clean air gov mandates don't use municipal water etc.  The gov is in your life no matter what.


RNprogressive

0 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

RNprogressive says ...



AMA approves of House Bill 3200:  In particular


In particular, we are pleased that the bill:

• Promises to extend coverage to all Americans through health insurance market reforms;

• Provides consumers with a choice of plans through a health insurance exchange;

• Includes essential health insurance reforms such as eliminating coverage denials based on pre-existing conditions;

• Recognizes that fundamental Medicare reforms, including repeal of the sustainable growth rate formula, are essential to the success of broader health system reforms;

• Encourages chronic disease management and care coordination through additional funding for primary care services, without imposing offsetting payment reductions on specialty care;

• Addresses growing physician workforce concerns;

• Strengthens the Medicaid program;

Requires individuals to have health insurance, and provides premium assistance to those who cannot afford it;

Includes prevention and wellness initiatives designed to keep Americans healthy;

• Makes needed improvements to the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative that will enable greater participation by physicians; and

• Initiates significant payment and delivery reforms by encouraging participation in new models such as accountable care organizations and the patient-centered medical home.


Yea, require health insurance, we require car insurance to drive why not health insurance.  Choice of plans duh not universal coverage.


If you want gov out of your lives, don't drive on the roads, don't send your  kids to public school, don't breathe the clean air gov mandates don't use municipal water etc.  The gov is in your life no matter what.


YEP! We "require car insurance to drive on our roads, we also "require" driver's licenses. In my last three accidents my vehicle was hit by a vehicle driven by an illegal alien with neither, and in one of those I was driving a marked police cruiser. Making laws doesn't make it so.


I really don't want no government, I just want a federal government restrained by the chains of the Constitution, and about 95+% of what they currently do is off those chains.


0 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

CaptainEricRN says ...



Seems a little silly to try to blame everything on one politician.....


OOOOO, the evil George Bush is at fault for everything!


OOOOO, the evil Bill Clinton is at fault for everything!


HEY! The SYSTEM stinks! It has gotten worse and worse through the years -


Giving the government more power over our lives is NOT going to help!




"Giving money and power to the government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys."

 P. J. O'rourke 


0 posts

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

RNprogressive says ...



Sowell is a free-market economist you know the guys who got us into the mortgage and banking mess.  He is at best a libertarian with strong conservative overtones.  Innovation away from market driven big insurance company, Big Pharma and big medical equipment etc is not going to be in his playbook.  He is one of those rich folks who likes to keep the masses poor, stupid and easily fed a line that will make them vote against their own best interests.  Yes I googled and searched him for his views and writings.


 


Here instead are some more practical reforms.  Note none of these take away your right to choose your type of health care.  No one is forcing you into a government health plan.  The Right has a vested interest in killling health care reform.  They don't care about you, the deficet, access to care none of it they care about getting back into power so they can make more money.  Seriously, you think Glenn Beck. Oreilly, Limbaugh, any of them came up with exactly the same news stories on the same day using the same words.  It is all scripted by the RNC talking points of the day.  Those guys are mainstream media and they are not Liberal so cut the crap about liberal bias in the media. Also look at the Oregon model the Mass model did not have enough cost controls in it.


- For Medicare patients, amortize medical reimbursements over 60 months and charge the estates of patients who die within this period half the cost of their unamortized care. Currently, a third of the cost of Medicare goes to treating patients in their last six months of life, and neither the patient nor his physician have any financial incentive to save taxpayer money however dim the prognosis. If an 85 year-old patient requests hip replacement surgery, this approach avoids arbitrary, hard-and-fast rules and gives his physician some discretion if the patient is in otherwise excellent health.


- Require that health insurers charge all smokers, alcoholics and overweight/obese individuals proportionately higher premiums, just as auto insures do with bad drivers. Smoking, drinking and overeating are personal choices.


- Similarly, for those patients with serious preexisting conditions and no insurance, establish a high risk/cost pool and assign each at random to a health insurer relative to the insurer's market share.


- Offer rebates to those who sign a waiver accepting binding arbitration and caps on health care provider liability.


- Allow health insurers to write basic policies that cover only cancer, cardiovascular disease, and trauma and pay out a lump sum equal to the median cost of treating each diagnostic indication.


- Require medical specialists to charge an all-inclusive, fixed fee for treating a given diagnostic indication and post these fees online along with audited treatment outcome statistics for patients under their care. Patients could also use this forum to post their comments on the quality of care provided. Purchasing health care should be as transparent as purchasing a book on Amazon. The current opaque fee-for-service arrangement that denies patients data on costs and outcomes rewards poor, inefficient medical care.


- Adopt the Oregon approach to control runaway Medicare and Medicaid spending. In this state, firm budgets are set each year which, in turn, determines the diagnostic indications treated. The state does not reimburse physicians for treating trivial cases such as the common cold, ingrown toenails or muscle aches. Nor does it reimburse futile cases where the indicated treatment makes little difference to the outcome

What got us into the mortgage and banking mess was most certainly NOT free market economists, it was your "progressives" in Congress deciding that not enough "disadvantaged" people owned their own homes and forced mortgage leders to make non-viable loans. You should get your facts straight as you are continually advising us to.


Thomas Sowell does have a big advantage over any liberal I have heard, read or talked to -- He is capable of rational thought.

Picture_021_max50

1306 posts

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

kellyj says ...



hey i suggested we extend medicare to cover the 50 million uninsured but nobody likes that idea HMMM i wonder why? could it be because its a terrible system that is the ultimate in gatekeeping and waste not to mention inefficient and lacking in its options?? pretty much sums up anything that is run by the government.  if HR 3200 is good enough for us than surely it should be good enough for those who are shoving it thru Congress!! as i see it now HR 3200 is good for only one thing and its used in the outhouse!!


 


They are looking for more ways to hide how they are spending our money.  I go back to my first thought from the first post by me.  I hate for those who dont have health coverage.   Im sorry but I dont want to pay for your insurance anymore than you want to pay for mine..........and I dont want to pay for your mortage any more than you want to pay for mine.   Another thing...........I am anti abortion, I plan on deducting the cost of what my state plans to spend on abortions from my taxes.  If I am allowed to keep my job at a facility and refuse to care for the abortion pt due to my religious beliefs,  I think its my right to refuse to fund abortions with my taxes due to my religious beliefs. 



We only have one heart, take care of it!

Angie

Photo_user_blank_big

509 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

OUCH!!!


i rest my case.... that last comment made me laugh outloud!! i'm sure it won't be so funny to some.


 


 


 

Photo_user_blank_big

509 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

i was referring to the one from WBately . He is very interesting and dare i say it ....rational.

-1 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

What got us into the mortgage and banking mess was most certainly NOT free market economists, it was your "progressives" in Congress deciding that not enough "disadvantaged" people owned their own homes and forced mortgage leders to make non-viable loans. You should get your facts straight as you are continually advising us to.




New York Times Article back in 1999


In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders," the article, by Steven Holmes, began.


"The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets, including the New York metropolitan region, will encourage those banks to exchange home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.


"Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits."

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

I cant say what the answer is to Health Care but I do know that I am a nurse, and have been in the field for 10+ years and for 3/4 of that time I have not had health insurance. Right now, I do not have insurance and I really cant afford it. How bazzarie is that??? I am in the field and I'm offered lousy coverage that no one can afford??


I am very lucky that I have been healthy.


I feel we need to do something, and I agree that Canada has had a long standing system that seems to work. Nothing is going to be perfect and please everybody, but there is a solution that is better then what we have now.

Photo_user_blank_big

284 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

1999 to 2009 what happened to the Republican controlled Congress and White House from 2001 to 2009?  Were they incapable of changing anything or just too fat and happy reaping the rewards off all of our backs.  Or too busy starting wars of choice, funding Exxon and Halliburton and raping the environment.  I give Bush credit for his work for Africa and against AIDs.  You all had 8 years to undo anything that was wrong about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Look up the type of economics he espouses and you see the picture of the last 30 years in the US,  I never said Clinton et al had no part in this mess although they did try to tackle healthcare (badly) and failed due to the same tactics the Right is employing now. Difference is we are all worse off than we were then and no end in sight to the jobs going over seas etc.  The companies take jobs overseas because health care etc cost too much to provide.  Don't go there on regulations for environment etc you've almost killed the planet as it is. 


 


RNprogressive

Picture_021_max50

1306 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Kittyrn says ...



What got us into the mortgage and banking mess was most certainly NOT free market economists, it was your "progressives" in Congress deciding that not enough "disadvantaged" people owned their own homes and forced mortgage leders to make non-viable loans. You should get your facts straight as you are continually advising us to.




New York Times Article back in 1999


In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders," the article, by Steven Holmes, began.


"The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets, including the New York metropolitan region, will encourage those banks to exchange home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.


 


 


"Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.


 


KITTYRN:   BRILLIANT VOICE OF REASON!  THANKS SO MUCH!   Dont forget John McCain tried for years to have Fannie Mae and Fredie Mac be regulated, but Barney Frank had the investigation shot down.  Not fact, but Ive lately heard it said that acorn was the strongarms making Fannie Mae an Freddie Mac do these loans. 



 


We only have one heart, take care of it!

Angie

Photo_user_blank_big

284 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Republican controlled congress for 6 of 8 years of the Bush administration.  Barney Frank was only committee chairman for 2 years. They had at least 6 if not more time to change it, sound the alarm, but they didn't.  Nice try but flawed logic and poor reasoning. 


 


RNprogressive

Photo_user_blank_big

509 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

 Healthcare reform should not be handled by the gov its none of their business kinda like telling us nurses how we need do our jobs.  politicians know nothing about it and should keep their greasy paws off of it. this is not a political agenda item but Obama has made it so.  maybe he should focus on the heart attack rates and diabetes of the black men in America .Maybe it has to do with access to care but those are real issues that need to be addressed! real issues are the 20 million illegal people living here and driving up the cost of care epecially the rate of diabetes in the hispanic population! that is a huge problem especially here in the border states! Presidents don't make policy and the Congress has been controlled for the past 2 years by the Democrats.  My problem with their plan is that they have exempted themselves from its coverage! the have separated themselves from the rest of us and its insulting ! how can one not see their "reform" for what it is ....putting more money and control in the very hands of people who refuse to go on "the plan" themselves! its crazy and i for one will not stop telling people ...everyone patients doctors fellow nurses my representatives and anyone who will listen what i think about their healthcare reform idea. Until there are specifics that outline how this plan is better than the one we have now which gives care to everyone and anyone who comes into the ER i am against it.  How can you make it illegal not to have insurance when the person is illegal to begin with??? see the insaneness of all of this ??? pls

Photo_user_blank_big

284 posts

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

The people who are exempt are already on government plans such as fed employees. native americans, veterans, military, fed prisoners etc.  I have government health care and have had it for 25 years no big deal.  Also if you like your health plan you can keep it. No one is forcing you to be on the public option. Also there is a lot of money in the bill for medical and nursing education.  I would thinK you would be behind more doctors and nurses.  Elder care is subsidized so the elderly will be able to stay in their homes.  I'm sure we all agree that is a good idea.


You all are going to end up in the ER with chest pain if you don't read the bill and calm down.  Besides it isn't final yet.  I know you can't wait to trot out your next pres candidate, with his/her great ideas...who will that be again? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,sound of crickets>>>>>>>>>>.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


 


RNprogressive

0 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

RNprogressive says ...



1999 to 2009 what happened to the Republican controlled Congress and White House from 2001 to 2009?  Were they incapable of changing anything or just too fat and happy reaping the rewards off all of our backs.  Or too busy starting wars of choice, funding Exxon and Halliburton and raping the environment.  I give Bush credit for his work for Africa and against AIDs.  You all had 8 years to undo anything that was wrong about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Look up the type of economics he espouses and you see the picture of the last 30 years in the US,  I never said Clinton et al had no part in this mess although they did try to tackle healthcare (badly) and failed due to the same tactics the Right is employing now. Difference is we are all worse off than we were then and no end in sight to the jobs going over seas etc.  The companies take jobs overseas because health care etc cost too much to provide.  Don't go there on regulations for environment etc you've almost killed the planet as it is. 


They were elected as Republicans and once they started drinking the DC Kool-Aid they began legislating like the worst of the Democrats. If you noticed they paid the price for that foolishness, although I must admit in their zeal to punish the GOP the voters threw ther baby out with the bathwater. There are times when vengence should be left to G-d.


0 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

RNprogressive says ...



The people who are exempt are already on government plans such as fed employees. native americans, veterans, military, fed prisoners etc.  I have government health care and have had it for 25 years no big deal.  Also if you like your health plan you can keep it. No one is forcing you to be on the public option. Also there is a lot of money in the bill for medical and nursing education.  I would thinK you would be behind more doctors and nurses.  Elder care is subsidized so the elderly will be able to stay in their homes.  I'm sure we all agree that is a good idea.


You all are going to end up in the ER with chest pain if you don't read the bill and calm down.  Besides it isn't final yet.  I know you can't wait to trot out your next pres candidate, with his/her great ideas...who will that be again? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,sound of crickets>>>>>>>>>>.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Sure you can keep your present insurance until the big draw of tax subsidized government giveaway drives all the private insurers out of business. Then you will have the choice of the government plan or no plan (OOPS!!! They won't leave you that choice.) Do you honestly believe that a government monopoly on the nation's healthcare is going to bring an improvement? If you buy that load, I do feel sorry for you.


Yes, the bill is not final yet and it won't be finalized until after Congress and the Senate vote on it. We end up buying another pig in a poke, and I can guarantee we won't be happy eating that bacon.


Picture_021_max50

1306 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

 


You all are going to end up in the ER with chest pain if you don't read the bill and calm down.  Besides it isn't final yet.  I know you can't wait to trot out your next pres candidate, with his/her great ideas...who will that be again? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,sound of crickets>>>>>>>>>>.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


 


I vote for Simon on American Idol.............I know he wasnt born here, but Obama wasnt either, besides who cares anymore?. I know nobody on TV does.......whether they proclaim to be our leaders or comedians.   Honestly, I dont give a crap.    Im gonna pull a Wesley Snipesand not pay my taxes and then I can get universal healthcare.   Everything that is happening to us was  planned long ago.


We only have one heart, take care of it!

Angie

Keith_shauna1_max50

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

I am here to tell you that I am outraged at the bill! Speaking of E.R.s have you worked one lately? The ERs of this country are federally mandated that they can not turn anyone away. That is why they are inundated with everything from serious conditions (Cardiac arrest) to the mundane (a cold). Nurses joke and call it the 24 hr Doctor's Office. Guess what? Imagine that on a national scale. Lines. Overload. Oh, but if you make a mistake, you're still liable.


And my dear, they have written it. In fact, you can google it and get a copy of it. They say "we're not finished with it" because people are burning up the phone lines to their Congressmen and the Congressmen are freaking out. But yes, my dear, it IS written in its entirety.


I can not BELIEVE any nurse in her right MIND would support it. I mean, when you cap medical care, then there are shortages (Remember the flu shot shortage--thanks Pres. Clinton). And in the case of shortages, someone can't get medical care. Hmmm, and let's see...if a 45 yo man comes in with CHF and a 55 yo man comes in with CHF and there are enough supplies for one...guess who gets it? That's right!!! The one who can give 10 more years in service to the "State."


This is 1984, Brave New World, and Animal Farm all rolled into one. We are already complaining about pt. overload; too much paperwork; burn-out; liability NOW in a private healthcare system. IMAGINE it then when we have to answer to not only the family but the gov't of the USA, because after the ceiling on healthcare costs, what do you think will happen? Who is almost ALWAYS the ones laid off first in the hospital? CNAs. Guess what that means for us? Can anyone say "Primary Care Nurse?" So, then, they still can't make ends meet, so they force retirement on the older nurses. Okay, so then they have to do something with those patients....oh, I know....let's UP the patient load!!! Well, now we're taking care of 10-15 patients. There's (inevitably) a medication error. Guess what? The family is now suing you. They win the lawsuit. Hospital is out more money. They have to cut more nurses. Patient load goes up. Then, the cycle continues until NO ONE wants to be a nurse. And um, are the DOCTORS going to take up the slack? Either they do or people are going to be given pain meds and sent on home to die.


When the government takes over to "fix" things, it NEVER works. NEVER. No matter the good intention. It NEVER works. Nurses, I encourage you to call and write your Congressmen and get in their face!!! This is going to destroy our country, but not before it destroys our field.

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Possibly states could do a better job than Feds.  THe area that needs to be hit hard is the private insurance sector.  Take a look at profits on any insurance fund,  CEO of insurance companies that make millions of dollars and we can not even pay our  teachers and police enough to survive in a single family household.  America may be the land of opportunity but it sure costs.  I agree with another post that medicine has become a business first.  I want to take care of PEOPLE not bodiesconsidered clients.

Photo_user_blank_big

284 posts

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Yes I have worked Er.  tHey are mandated to not turn anyone away so they can't dump non-paying patients on county hospitals who were the only ones to take then in the old days.  If you have an insured populace there wiil be primary care providers they can access so the colds etc don't go to the emergency rooms.  If you have an insured populace you have much more preventitive care so not as much crisis illness.  They fire nurses in Cananda, France, Germany etc in fact they would like more just like we would like more but we can't make them fast enough because there aren't enough professors and nursing schools are expensive to operate so many universities have done away with their programs or can't afford to expand the programs they have now.  By the way Primary care nursing was not driven by a nursing shortage it was driven by delivering quality care so that you had a smaller nuse patient ratio than you have on team nursing with care extenders like CNA's.  No way if they had less nurses could they do primary care.Lived through that too several times.


Quit being hysterical all of you.


By the way Angie, Hawaii was a state since 1959, the President has a birth certificate  verified and with the raised state seal from 1961.  There is no conspiracy he is a legitimate citizen and he is president.  What you are all saying in code is that he shouldn't be president because he is black.  Many of the birthers are racist and this is their way of getting around the label.  Are you racist or just believe whatever they tell you?  I live in Hawaii and know preople who know the family and saw him the day after he was born in Hawaii.  Now go find a new conspiracy.


RNprogressive

Photo_user_blank_big

7 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

The media 'spin' is that 'nurses support single-payer system'.    Nurses are a diverse group, but my sense is that MOST NURSES ARE AGAINST UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE and a single-payer system.   Reform, yes.....   But it SHOULD NOT:  push out private insurance companies, include federal abortion funding or include labor union involvement.         Reform SHOULD:  address current Medicare/-aid waste & fraud, prevent mis-use of ED's.   The debate has become politicized and the root cause issues are now barely recognizable.


Nurses -- stay dialed-in to this.   You can speak out and bring some sanity to the discussion...

Photo_user_blank_big

54 posts

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

RNprogressive, you are astute.  i was beginning to wonder about the true motivation for such rabid alarm.  It's very very very very sad to think you may just have hit the nail on the head with the last paragraph of your last post.  Sad, sad, sad.

Photo_user_blank_big

509 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

the President does not know what is in the bill.  why does he just admit it and move on? being honest is not a crime.  being indifferent is wrong. I am happy to live in a free country where we can critique ones choices and ones reasons for doing things.  I believe that this bill will not allow me to have the freedom to choose.  I think that is really what we all fear the most about passing this so quickly and without healthy debate.  Don't forget the USS Cole or the first WTC incident these things were signs of what was happening in the world and no one.....well very few were paying attention.  Please fellow nurses and all those in the great field of medicene pay rapt attention to what is transpiring NOW in our Congress. It will affect your job and your insurance and ultimately your health.

-1 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Yes everyone, calm down,


drink the kool-aid.  Get in a neat line and drink the kool-aid, it will be alright.

-1 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

 


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_obama_fact_check


WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama's assertion Wednesday that government will stay out of health care decisions in an overhauled system is hard to square with the proposals coming out of Congress and with his own rhetoric.


Even now, nearly half the costs of health care in the U.S. are paid for by government at all levels. Federal authority would only grow under any proposal in play.


A look at some of Obama's claims in his prime-time news conference:


OBAMA: "We already have rough agreement" on some aspects of what a health care overhaul should involve, and one is: "It will keep government out of health care decisions, giving you the option to keep your insurance if you're happy with it."


THE FACTS: In House legislation, a commission appointed by the government would determine what is and isn't covered by insurance plans offered in a new purchasing pool, including a plan sponsored by the government. The bill also holds out the possibility that, over time, those standards could be imposed on all private insurance plans, not just the ones in the pool.


Indeed, Obama went on to lay out other principles of reform that plainly show the government making key decisions in health care. He said insurance companies would be barred from dropping coverage when someone gets too sick, limits would be set on out-of-pocket expenses, and preventive care such as checkups and mammograms would be covered.


It's true that people would not be forced to give up a private plan and go with a public one. The question is whether all of those private plans would still be in place if the government entered the marketplace in a bigger way.


He addressed some of the nuances under questioning. "Can I guarantee that there are going to be no changes in the health care delivery system?" he said. "No. The whole point of this is to try to encourage changes that work for the American people and make them healthier."


He acknowledged then that the "government already is making some of these decisions."


___


OBAMA: "I have also pledged that health insurance reform will not add to our deficit over the next decade, and I mean it."


THE FACTS: The president has said repeatedly that he wants "deficit-neutral" health care legislation, meaning that every dollar increase in cost is met with a dollar of new revenue or a dollar of savings. But some things are more neutral than others. White House Budget Director Peter Orszag told reporters this week that the promise does not apply to proposed spending of about $245 billion over the next decade to increase fees for doctors serving Medicare patients. Democrats and the Obama administration argue that the extra payment, designed to prevent a scheduled cut of about 21 percent in doctor fees, already was part of the administration's policy, with or without a health care overhaul.


Beyond that, budget experts have warned about various accounting gimmicks that can mask true burdens on the deficit. The bipartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget lists a variety of them, including back-loading the heaviest costs at the end of the 10-year period and beyond.


___


OBAMA: "You haven't seen me out there blaming the Republicans."


THE FACTS: Obama did so in his opening statement, saying, "I've heard that one Republican strategist told his party that even though they may want to compromise, it's better politics to 'go for the kill.' Another Republican senator said that defeating health reform is about 'breaking' me."


___


OBAMA: "I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that. But I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home, and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately."


THE FACTS: The facts are in dispute between black scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr. and the white police sergeant who arrested him at his Cambridge, Mass., home when officers went there to investigate a reported break-in. But this much is clear: Gates wasn't arrested for being in his own home, as Obama implies, but for allegedly being belligerent when the sergeant demanded his identification. The president did mention that the professor was charged with disorderly conduct. Charges were dropped.


___


OBAMA: "If we had done nothing, if you had the same old budget as opposed to the changes we made in our budget, you'd have a $9.3 trillion deficit over the next 10 years. Because of the changes we've made, it's going to be $7.1 trillion."


THE FACTS: Obama's numbers are based on figures compiled by his own budget office. But they rely on assumptions about economic growth that some economists find too optimistic. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, in its own analysis of the president's budget numbers, concluded that the cumulative deficit over the next decade would be $9.1 trillion.


___


Associated Press writer Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar contributed to this report

Picture_021_max50

1306 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

He spent 55 minutes saying nothing about his healthcare reform.  He didnt say how much it would cost, who would pay, how is he planning on kicking our elderly out of care because they wont live long enough to enjoy their hip replacement.  Yesterday he even said he didnt know what was on the bill.   I feel he felt the majority of his Prime Time speech was to try to speek soothingly to the lower IQ AmericansHe because they cant read through his horsecrap dialogue.  He loves to hear himself  talk.   "Blue dog Dems"...they are the ones blocking at this point.  They serve some wealthy communities, 1 was referenced by a wealthy town in Colorado.  They dont feel its their problem to pay for the healthcare for 45-50 million or whatever the number is today........for their healthcare.   Freshman Dem from Colorado is a big thorn in Obamas side...........sucks to be him.   Yanno, when I was forced to do presentations for school, I crammed and made notes on index cards.  For tests I crammed like hell.   Maybe Nobama can learn some good study habits.  Before he addresses the country next time over how he plans on spending their money.  Couldnt hurt to try to learn about what he;s trying to take away from us.  I, for 1, find it impossible to think he has intentions of actually giving the country all those promises he made while runing for President.  How can he be believed??


We only have one heart, take care of it!

Angie

Next Page >