Everything Nurses >> Nurse Talk >> "Pregnant Man" Gives Birth to 2nd Child!

-4

"Pregnant Man" Gives Birth to 2nd Child!

1,978 Views
63 Replies Flag as inappropriate
N3207050_38908984_8699_max50

201 posts

back to top

Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Thomas Beatie, the infamous "pregnant man," deliverd his second child this week...a bouncing baby boy! While thsi pregnancy was much quieter than the first (remember the hoopla!?), he and his family are starting to make headlines again. Sound off! What do you think about this situation?

008_max50

7788 posts

back to top
-2

Rated: -2 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

It is ridiculous!


A good man loves other. A better man loves God. A great man loves God and lives well among others! I miss you daddy!

N3207050_38908984_8699_max50

201 posts

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Read the full story here on NursingLink!

_small__animepaper_wallpapers_naruto_kadalapi_1_33___thisres__68477_max50

2 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Men cannot have babies.  Just because you have your breasts removed and take hormones does not make you a man.  This person has a uterus, therefore the person is a woman.

Jill_max50

52 posts

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

jeezzzzz.......how in the world can his wife breastfeed? she didnt give birth....and I agree......because he or rather she still has a uterus and all the reproductive organs of a female, still makes that person a female..........guess his wife is a cross dresser? how can she get pregnant without sperm????? hmmmmmmm 

0 posts

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

I think that the media helps feed all this non-sense....there are way more important topics to be focused on in the media then if a woman, who is now a man gives birth....He/She wanted so badly to be a man, then why does he continue to do what only women are suppose to do.  I understand his partner is unable to conceive, but come on...  Maybe they can be the next reality TV show. 

Dsc04645_-_copy_max50

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

GBPrice says ...


 


akind of weird!


 



Thomas Beatie, the infamous "pregnant man," deliverd his second child this week...a bouncing baby boy! While thsi pregnancy was much quieter than the first (remember the hoopla!?), he and his family are starting to make headlines again. Sound off! What do you think about this situation?


Vilroy_jan_2008_006_max50

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

If 'she' wanted to be a man so badly, why didn't 'he' have 'his' reproductive organs removed?  The media has sensationalized this to the point where with some people believe that someone born a male can have a baby!  I am a male, and if it was possible for me to have a baby naturally, I would be the first to do so.  My role in the process is to provide the sperm.  I accept my role lovingly.  It makes me no less of a parent than the mother who provided the egg.  We both need each other.  We both have a role to play.  This story is not about a pregnant man, it is about a woman who wanted to be like a man but kept the most important thing that makes her a woman, her reproductive organs!!

008_max50

7788 posts

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Amen Sarah!


A good man loves other. A better man loves God. A great man loves God and lives well among others! I miss you daddy!

Photo_user_blank_big

4 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Disgusting!!!!!!

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

 I have uterus too and can carry a baby for 9 months.  I'm almost certain that there will not be global hype when I deliver..I don't really understand the excitement about all this..I could understand the hype more if (s)he would have gotten everything removed with the reassignment, then yes I would be quite amazed.

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

I don't believe that it should receive so much attention.  I read some of the book, and the "man" used to be female and still possesses a uterus and ovaries.  So while this is a a transgendered person, "he" is still female, and the doctors gave "him" female hormones instead of the male hormones "he" was taking.  I firmly believe that you cannot change your genetic makeup and inherent gender simply by adding or removing reproductive organs.

Images_max50

5 posts

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Oh please its still a woman it just looks like a man on the outside.  The media are idiots.

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

the media is taking this out of proportion..like always!!..But the ones I feel sorry are those kids he/she have.Did they ever think how psychologically are going to get the kids prepare for this when they find out..Don't get me wrong,I don't see anything wrong two people from the same gender having kids, but now the kids see mommy and daddy on the outside they are physically diferrent but inside they are the same. He should of had a psychological test done before he change his gender because obviously he still want to feel like a woman. And they wonder why is this world the way it is!!!!

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

I believe that GOD made this person a woman!  She is going against GOD when she wants to be a man.  She didnt get her organs removed though so it is a confusing situation.  The headlines are making this into something its not.  It shoud say "Woman that looks like man gives birth to second child".  I know a few women (that look like men) that have had babys.  NO BIG DEAL!  These are just 2 lesbian woman that didnt have to adopt.

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Men do not have uterus, ovaries, etc. I do not find this fascinating at all.  He is still a she to me. This is not miraculous because he is still a she! Just because you have hair on your face and chest does not make you a man because you still have the organs of a female in which you were born with. HELLO PEOPLE!!!! Now when you find a man that was born a man and still have all male organs and they become pregnant then let me know, because that will be MIRACULOUS!!!!!

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

This is a joke.If she wanted to be pregnant stay as woman.You can not try to change Gods will.You are a woman and as long as you have children you will always be.Now you are just an ugly woman.Trying to be a man.

Photos_067_max50

1 post

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

This he/she will spend eternity paying for it's sins!!! God's wrath is upon it!!!

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

I feel the entire story line is simply a bunch of lies.  This is another woman having a child.  She just chose to introduce herself to the world as a man.  The media is suppose to present  the facts not sensationalise a lie.  I am sadden by the fact so many people don't seem to know what they are but that doesn't erase the fact that sperm and egg uniting equals baby.  Therefore male and female makes babies.  This is not rocket science.

Photo_user_blank_big

2 posts

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

I wish they would stop calling this "medically altered female" a male. I agree with everyone that only a women has a uterus therefore a "man" can't be pregnant.  NO ONE can change their sex,  you are not only male or female because of your genitals and the way you look externally,  you are male or female because of your genes.  Woman have XX and men XY chromosomes .  There is no doctor that can change that.  This is why I call her a medically altered female not a male.  She will never be a male IMO.  I compare it to this,  If I dyed my dogs hair black and white striped and made it look so much like a zebra that it even fooled people would it be a zebra?  NO it would still be a dog,  it would still bark,  fetch and have the temperment of a dog.  Its the same thing.  Men generally think differently then women,  have more physical strength, often are less emotional than women. Her surgery can not change this about her.  This woman is deceiving herself.  I often hear them say that "I've always felt like a man inside"  (or woman),  my question is how do you know how it feels to be a man since you have never been one? I am very passionate about this topic because I have a cousin that is doing this same thing, having gender reassignment surgery and she is only 23 years old.  She also does not tell the women that she dates that she is a female.  This makes me very upset because they have the right to know she is a medically altered female,  but I digress.  anyway thats how I feel about this pregnant male issue.   

Dx_tummyache_max50

10 posts

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

She is not a 'MAN- not male' at all. She was born as a female and will be a female forever regardless of her outlook.I wish the gossiper editor shouldn't even mention about the title as a man who is just put the male cloth on that doesn't mean she is a male.


ENOUGH is ENOUGH ~  all the practices and playing around with your guys and gals human features. IT IS TOTALLY ABUSING AND IMMORAL!!  HOW FAR ~ DO HUMEN CAN GO AGAINST THE WILL OF OUR CREATOR.  GETTING OUT OF CONTROL~


'If little silly child paints the pumpkin with greenish color and strips on it, we don't call it a watermelon?!' 


To the editor? I understand you need money to survive but not this way. Please change the HEAD LINE correctly. I understand how weired we are as fallen creatures but NOT this way.


In addition, there are more ethical and educational topics in Nurse Link, please don't bring up this kind of nonsense story anymore~ we have better things to discuss and share about while living in this given life. 


 

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

It may  feel good getting all the attention now,but you know what?hell awits you.How can you so proudly defile the work of your creator?It's just unfortunate foe the poor kids......what a confusion  for them.

0 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

I think Beatie's story would make an interesting documentary when her kids are older & able to articulate their upbringing. I would like to know why she decided to keep her reproductive organs and how her kids felt growing up in this unique environment. I don't think it's immoral or against what God wanted. I am an atheist.

Img_0649_max50

1 post

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

 This thing is just a modern version of some the  freak shows I used to see when the circus came to town back when I was a kid. Lets stop giving these wackos attention and maybe they will go away! 

Great_pictures__10__max50

453 posts

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

This "man" is not a man. Who is he/she trying to kid? Herself or the stupid media? Sad thing is, she's was a beautiful woman. She looks weird trying to be male.


Claire Kruszka

Highfashion1-1_max50

2 posts

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

blueorchid23 says ...



I think Beatie's story would make an interesting documentary when her kids are older & able to articulate their upbringing. I would like to know why she decided to keep her reproductive organs and how her kids felt growing up in this unique environment. I don't think it's immoral or against what God wanted. I am an atheist.


If you are a true atheist, why did you even say "I don't think it's....against what god wanted". The fact that you even brought up god in that way makes me question if you are really an atheist???


Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

You can call yourself whatever you like, and that doesn't necessarily make it so. If this person has a uterus and female chromosomes, then it is female whether it has a mustache or not.The media needs to focus on important stories.

3_max50

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

I agree with all the people that find this an unimportant waste of news space... and probably a fundraiser for the mother.  Of course this is the same society that watches all of the un-reality shows and acts as if Paris Hilton makes a difference in the cosmos.

Photo_user_blank_big

2 posts

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Thomas is not really a man - take a zebra's stipes away and it is still a zebra.  He still has female reproductive organs so why shouldn't  she/he have a child.  why are so many people so hung up about this?  Single, and unwed movie stars, pop stars, etc. have children every day it seems like and everyone oooh's and ahhh's about their kids.  We have accepted unwed mothers getting pregnant, and aging women getting pregnant and having children in their 40's, and older  because their clock is ticking, so why shouldn't a couple who obviously love each other and want a family have one.    Having a child is a blessing to those who want to have children.  While they are an alternative family, they appear on the outside to be the traditional family unit.    Don't look at this as a "man" having a child, but a "family" having a child.  Bottom line, it is nobody's business but theirs what they do.  As long as they have a loving family unit, take care of the children they are having, and are there for their children who cares!  I just hope they don't end up like the dog and pony show that Jon & Kate plus 8 appears to have turned into. 

Photo_user_blank_big

2 posts

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted almost 4 years ago

 

Thomas is not really a man - take a zebra's stipes away and it is still a zebra.  He still has female reproductive organs so why shouldn't  she/he have a child.  why are so many people so hung up about this?  Single, and unwed movie stars, pop stars, etc. have children every day it seems like and everyone oooh's and ahhh's about their kids.  We have accepted unwed mothers getting pregnant, and aging women getting pregnant and having children in their 40's, and older  because their clock is ticking, so why shouldn't a couple who obviously love each other and want a family have one.    Having a child is a blessing to those who want to have children.  While they are an alternative family, they appear on the outside to be the traditional family unit.    Don't look at this as a "man" having a child, but a "family" having a child.  Bottom line, it is nobody's business but theirs what they do.  As long as they have a loving family unit, take care of the children they are having, and are there for their children who cares!  I just hope they don't end up like the dog and pony show that Jon & Kate plus 8 appears to have turned into. 

Next Page >