General Forums >> NursingLink Anonymous Zone >> Same Sex Marriage

Rate

Same Sex Marriage

720 Views
90 Replies Flag as inappropriate
back to top

Posted about 1 month ago

 

How many of you guys in here are in favor of same sex marriage, why and why not?!

back to top
+2

Rated: +2 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

We live in a world filled with violence and hate.  I feel that if two people love eachother, are dedicated to eachother and want to build a life together then let them have at it.  It makes no difference whether it's two men, two women, or one of each.  Let's be honest, heterosexuals haven't  done such an awesome job at keeping their marriages together. The divorce rate in this country is ridiculous.  Maybe we could learn somethng from same sex marriage, who knows?  Regardless though why should I care who anyone else wakes up with tomorow morning?  As long as they aren't waking up with my husband, I could care less.  Everyone deserves to be happy in their lives and if they are not hurting others in the process then let them pursue their happiness with whomever they choose.


AISHA


 

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Anonymous says ...



We live in a world filled with violence and hate.  I feel that if two people love eachother, are dedicated to eachother and want to build a life together then let them have at it.  It makes no difference whether it's two men, two women, or one of each.  Let's be honest, heterosexuals haven't  done such an awesome job at keeping their marriages together. The divorce rate in this country is ridiculous.  Maybe we could learn somethng from same sex marriage, who knows?  Regardless though why should I care who anyone else wakes up with tomorow morning?  As long as they aren't waking up with my husband, I could care less.  Everyone deserves to be happy in their lives and if they are not hurting others in the process then let them pursue their happiness with whomever they choose.


AISHA


 



I have to agree, and although I may not chose the same life style for myself, what business is it of mine to tell someone else not to... simply because I do not approve?


It should be anyone's choice to make for themself, who they marry and spend their time with (regardless of sex), and they should have a right to civil union.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

agree with posters but here is a thought........the amount of money this marriage thing may generate is going to be SUPER!!!! it may even be enough to help california get out of the hole we are currently in!!YEEHAW i say marry up and pay up and then let the chips fall where they may!!!! i see a big bonus check coming for all those divorce lawyers!!!! i bet two daddys can fight longer than two mommys!!!

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

I don't have a problem with domestic partnerships having the same benefits of marriage.  But marriage needs to stay between a man and a woman.  Domestic partnerships ensure that both parties are of legal age.  It only is a fair jump, for a 40 year old man to marry a 16 year old boy (with his drunken parents consent).  Domestic partnerships keep pedophiles, from adolescent males. 

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

"pedophiles" have no place in the gay marriage discussion. it's a strawman that reveals the basic inability to understand the issue at hand. same goes with the slippery-slope arguements about beastiality or plural marriages.

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Anonymous says ...



I don't have a problem with domestic partnerships having the same benefits of marriage.  But marriage needs to stay between a man and a woman.  Domestic partnerships ensure that both parties are of legal age.  It only is a fair jump, for a 40 year old man to marry a 16 year old boy (with his drunken parents consent).  Domestic partnerships keep pedophiles, from adolescent males. 



Why would you assume that just because a man is gay, he is a pedophile and chasing after every little boy on the block. That is such a huge stereotype.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

 A marriage license is a state issued legal document. The opposition to same sex marriage is from the members of religions.. If a religion does not want to sanctify a marriage.. that is a right the religion has... BUT, there is no reason on earth why a civil ceremony.. such as done by a judge or justice of the peace should be denied same sex couples.


It is the right thing to do to grant same sex couples the same STATE GRANTED rights as anyone else.

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Pedophiles are typically  HETEROSEXUAL....I think the word you are looking for is PEDERAST.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Pedophiles, each have their preferences.  There are pedophiles that prefer young men.   I didn't say or imply that gays were pedophiles, but I'll say it's a straw mans argument to not consider the potential impact of same sex marriage, for which pedophiles will use.  I suggest you google NAMBA.  They advocate for same sex boy-man relationships.  This would just be a legalized avenue for them to exploit.   It's not my inability to understand, its your inability to see that this will be exploited.  The first priority of anyone should be to protect kids.  Domestic partnerships could give all the same legal rights that marriage would, and prevent underage exploitation that will occur.  Google, NAMBLA.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

 The vast vast vast majority of child sex abuse is heterosexual in nature... can we say that heterosexual marriage is a gateway to heterosxual pedophilia? and NO ONE takes NAMBLA... not NAMBA seriously.. it is a fringe group.. it is like using the Fundamentalist Church of Latter Day Saints to show the Chuch of Latter Day Saints condone polygamy.


 


Again.. the term you want to use when addressing homosexual pedophilia is PEDERASTY.. its a more exact expression.

back to top
-1

Rated: -1 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

       I'm not a hater type, but I don't support same sex marriages just on the basis that it is wrong; I have no doubt or have I ever.  I'm also a Christian which supports this as well.  That is what I think about that.  End of subject.  Whats next.


 


High hopes & God speed - Tim, R.N.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

If domestic partnerships, allowed for the same benefits of marriage, Why would anyone demand the 'right' to be married?  Doesn't make any sense, whats the beef? 

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Since the marriage license is a STATE granted document.. it only stands to reason that a gay couple shold have the very same STATE GRANTED rights  as a heterosexual couple.... If a church does not want to sanctify that union that is licensed by the STATE.. ( A secular entity) The church has every right to....


But homosexuals are citizens of the  country, and to deny them rights based on religious doctrine, and the opposition is clearly religion based,  is clearly a violation of the 1st ammendment to the constitution.....I would guess the Establishment Clause.

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

God created Adam and Eve to pro- create.  It is an abomination.  Don't ask do not tell.  they have problems just like heterosexuals.  Its just disgusting and not good for family values. 

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Relationship between  two person, of the same sex is forbidden in the bible. That's the reason why Sodom and Gomorah were rained of brimstone and fire, because God condemn such acts. And the worst part of it, God created marriage for the union of man and a woman and not of the same sex...

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Since the marriage license is a STATE granted document.. it only stands to reason that a gay couple shold have the very same STATE GRANTED rights  as a heterosexual couple.... If a church does not want to sanctify that union that is licensed by the STATE.. ( A secular entity) The church has every right to....


That argument falls way short.  The state could just as easily grant licenses for domestic partnerships, and 'sanctify' the relationship as legal and equal.  So I'll ask it again, why marriage?  Domestic partnerships, could just as easily be granted total equality, and be 'state sanctified'.  Unless, there is another motivation????




back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Anonymous says ...



Relationship between  two person, of the same sex is forbidden in the bible. That's the reason why Sodom and Gomorah were rained of brimstone and fire, because God condemn such acts. And the worst part of it, God created marriage for the union of man and a woman and not of the same sex...


 


 


 



This is the reason gay marriage is opposed. Otherwise and intelligent argument against it cannot be made.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

NO. the argument does not fall way short... other than religious opposition to gay marriage there is no reason for the state not to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples.


All I ahve seen is religious opposition.... We are not a theocracy.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Marriage is religious period.  If gays are given equal rights with a domestic partnership, there is no reason to demand marriage.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Anonymous says ...



How many of you guys in here are in favor of same sex marriage, why and why not?!



All people have rights!! gay,straight,and everyone else have rights for choices!!! And those of you who do not agree keep your opinions to yourself!! I have both women and men who have the same rights as everyone else!! Self choice, self opinions!

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

they can have the right to domestic partnerships.  And I'm not going to keep my opinion to myself.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

keep your opinions to yourself????wow why don't you move to Chile or better yet Mexico where being a homosexual is actually a crime punishable by death.  are you kidding me here?!!! this is america and we have the right nay the obligation to say what we think.  disagreeing is part of being in a civilized society.  we do not all have to agree. and you are the reason that many people come to a forum to speak their mind !!I say speak up say it loud be proud don't be silent this is a free country .  Some want gay rights some do not .  it does not make or break us in my opinion... its just how one feels ! get over yourself. live a gay life be proud stop being petty there is a great bumper sticker out there it says ...if you don't like gay marriage then ...don't have one!! 

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Anonymous says ...



Anonymous says ...



Relationship between  two person, of the same sex is forbidden in the bible. That's the reason why Sodom and Gomorah were rained of brimstone and fire, because God condemn such acts. And the worst part of it, God created marriage for the union of man and a woman and not of the same sex...


 


 This is the reason gay marriage is opposed. Otherwise and intelligent argument against it cannot be made.


 


First, an inteliigent argument must begin with correct facts. Sodom and Gomorah was not destroyed due to homosexulaility. It was destroyed due to inhospitalitiy.


back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

I like Mexico and Iran that this abomination is punishable by crime.  There are some things that just need to stay in the closet.... Keep it there.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

I was just wondering how is any of this anonymous when I says who posts what on the updates/recent activity section?

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

You have to beleive in the bible to beleive that homosexuality is a sin.  To assume that everyone has the same beleifs as you do is ridiculous.   Furthermore, I find it outrageaous that so many self proclaimed christians are so holier than thou and judgemental.   If what you say is true, then let those who are doing the sinning suffer the consequence, if in fact there is one.  And lets not forget, we are ALL sinners in one way or another.  I'm fairly confident that God also looks down upon the self righteous.

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Anonymous says ...



Anonymous says ...



Anonymous says ...



Relationship between  two person, of the same sex is forbidden in the bible. That's the reason why Sodom and Gomorah were rained of brimstone and fire, because God condemn such acts. And the worst part of it, God created marriage for the union of man and a woman and not of the same sex...


 


 This is the reason gay marriage is opposed. Otherwise and intelligent argument against it cannot be made.


 


First, an inteliigent argument must begin with correct facts. Sodom and Gomorah was not destroyed due to homosexulaility. It was destroyed due to inhospitalitiy.



You can say that again, wanting to have sex with your guests is really very unhsopitable, man to man, woman to man, so how do you call that?! Very unhospitable people, right?! That is straightening out the facts that you know, or if youre not yet convinced,take a theology class...


back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Anonymous says ...



I like Mexico and Iran that this abomination is punishable by crime.  There are some things that just need to stay in the closet.... Keep it there.



I like Iran as well... christianity is a crime there.....

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Anonymous says ...



Since the marriage license is a STATE granted document.. it only stands to reason that a gay couple shold have the very same STATE GRANTED rights  as a heterosexual couple.... If a church does not want to sanctify that union that is licensed by the STATE.. ( A secular entity) The church has every right to....


That argument falls way short.  The state could just as easily grant licenses for domestic partnerships, and 'sanctify' the relationship as legal and equal.  So I'll ask it again, why marriage?  Domestic partnerships, could just as easily be granted total equality, and be 'state sanctified'.  Unless, there is another motivation????






What is your motivation to not allow marriage?

Next Page >