Everything Nurses >> Nursing Politics/Activism >> Health Care Overhaul Discussion
Health Care Overhaul Discussion
|
453 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago
kellyj says ...
I swear Kelly, I think that's what BO wants! he kisses up to those tyrants while he disses our allies. Wake up America! Can't you see this left wing loon is slowly destroying everything we satnd for? I take healthcare a little more personally since it is my bread and butter. Pretty soon that will be way smaller. Claire Kruszka |
|
509 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago ........ohh so sorry about the "political ranting" so when the healthcare bill is fully up and running who will be the "bad guy" to go around yanking poor people's subsidies when they "miss the mark" and violate the provisions of their so called subsidy? and better yet how will they know when you have violated said provisions?its possible that this government job may be even more despised than the dreaded IRS but who knows. I wonder what the annual salary will be for these jobs? will there be bonuses?? like catch five losers win a free colorectal inspection? haha ..just kidding
|
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago editor says ...
Add 15 million pe
|
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago all people need a relationship with health. The most recent changes are a goverment moving in the direction of where is america 's health, be this inside individual histories or current illnesses a living human with any GOOD plan is good and the bill has ment to give access in places , families, or interests of practioners in medicine or public, ; the bill works. Americans are scrutinizing . work has a health plan, is this the same as the access to my healthcare? ins may not give away profits to healthcare, insurance gives away money. Puropses ? I m still stepping in the news on this topic and my life works, like this is one way , yes. "thank the self" |
|
150 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago and dream on Already a major insurance company in our town laid off half the workers when the bill past, this is going to make us mainly an unemployed town. A month ago, there was a 10 percent cut from medicare to the nursing homes. I lost a contract from a foster child agency because medicaid because they are sending everyone to the local mental health (government)--which means they do not get appointments, get them changed and treat them minimally because they still prefer clients with regular insurance. It means they will still come to me and I will probably as usual see them free for their emergencies. We have a very busy doctor that is no longer going to take medicaid and he is going to limit medicare patients. This is just in my small town. What is happening elsewhere? My husband sells many types of insurance and he said, no insurance companay can handle taking someone with preexisting conditions, because people will wait until they know something serious is wrong, and the companies will go broke. I think we cannot think this is over, because the polls do not agree that this bill is wonderful. Oh and how is it that increasing taxes on medical equipment is beneficial to the health and welfare of anyone. How crazy is this. I think I am in the twilight zone.
|
|
284 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago Your husband who says everyone willwait until they have a pre=existing condition may have a point WHICh is why there is a mandate for everyone to buy insurance! Everyone buys into coverage and spreads the risk, "healthy" or people who think they are healthy, pay into the system as well as those who are requiring services. Just like auto insurance. We don't all have accidents but we all pay into the system just in case we do. This is why people have flood ins etc just incase they need it. Why is health any different? The major insurance company laid people off to keep their CEO bonus intact. IF they cut that they would be able to keep their workers. Follow the money to the deep pockets. Also many insurance companies were overstaffed with people to handle the volumes of paperwork generated to deny care or make it so complicated the claims don't get filed. RNprogressive |
|
Account Removed -33 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago As a government attorney (10 years State, 10 years Federal), here is my opinion: Auto insurance is a State mandate, not Federal. Also, you do not have to buy it - only if you have a car. Flood insurance in specified areas is mandated by mortgage companies, and only if you buy a house. I think we have entered a period where people think of government as government, and don't truly understand the difference between state and federal. States are soverign, and the federal government is constitutionally limited in it's powers (or is SUPPOSED to be!). The US Constitution does not allow the federal government to force individuals to buy a product or service. Don't bring up the Commerce Clause - this doies not touch interstate commerce to the extent envisioned by the drafters of the Constitution... I won't argue - the insurance companies suck... My own primary physician gave up private practice (he's only in his 40's) because of the unbelievable bureaucratic burden imposed by insurers and government. The new law has some god provisions - but honestly, I truly believe Obama's primary agenda is to change our country to a Utopian socialist society. And no, I don't care how you define socialism - after all, Social Securty and Medicare (and welfare) are "socialist" programs, but there is a need there. Some "socialist" type programs are necessary in a country of 300 million people. The problem is that we are quickly adding more socialist programs, and are quite likely to be Europeanized. This is NOT good! Just my humble opinion.... |
|
Account Removed -1 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago Well here we go; To all of you that stood there and said that my taxes wouldn't go up. WRONG this is only the begining chances are this is going to be a 10-20% TAX......GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF THE SAND "Acknowledging it would be a highly unpopular move, White House economic adviser Paul Volcker said yesterday the United States should consider imposing a "value added tax" similar to those charged in Europe to help get the deficit under control. A VAT is a national sales tax that, like state and city sales taxes, would be collected by retailers. Volcker, at the New-York Historical Society, told a panel on the global financial crisis that Congress might also have to consider new taxes on carbon and energy. The VAT suggestion was immediately met with outrage by Republicans. "It shouldn't surprise anyone that the Obama White House would advocate a European-style tax to help finance their European-style government health-care plan," said Brian Walsh, a spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee." |
|
150 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago For those of you that think no preexisting conditions is always good then let me put this as simply as possible. If i buy insurance from American Family with a high deductible, lets say 300 a month and a 5000 deductible. I go to the doctor and find out I have cancer. So I change to bluecross, at 600 a month with no deductible so I can save many dollars. That is what people will do. NO one can be denied with preexisting conditions and we can shop around. So we can buy cheap insurance until we find a better company. Therefore, insurance companies, will go under. They will be assuming large debts initially. I have had blue cross for several years and have hardly used it. Some people buy insurance and unfortunately have to use it right away just by chance. However, if everyone bought insurance just because they knew they needed immediately, insurance companies could not keep up. then we all go on goverment insurance which is exactly what this administration wants. If you could buy car insurance that way, have a menial policy, then feasibly you could wreck your car, buy better auto coverage and have your new policy pay for it. And just think what are we going to do with all the unemployed insurance agents and insurance clerks. More unemployment, no doubt. I still want to know why medical equipment is being taxed. I don't care about tanning beds being taxed except that may be a racial thing, because only white people tan. This bill still stinks and the stency is as bad as gas gangrene. |
|
150 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago something amusing about people I am not sure how many times my husband had calls in the middle of the night, wanting fire insurance and their house was on fire at the time. A few times he has had some men that wanted life insurance that day and when he told them the procedures they had to go through, they might have gone to other companies. But strangely, some of these immediate requests, later we would read in the paper that their wife nearly got run over, one was in a house fire and barely got out. |
|
509 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago well when there is a reverse migration to mexico i think i will be going with them i hear the tequilarias are a great place to set up a clinic!!! hah ha ha |
|
509 posts back to top |
| Posted about 3 years ago this was sent to me by my coworker who also happens to be a gay republican Let me get this straight.....we have passed a healthcare plan written by a committee whose chairman says he doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it but exempts themselves from it, signed by a president that also did not read it and who smokes, with funding to be administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese and financed by a country that's broke. What the hell could possibly go wrong???? |

ople to Medicaid.